Match Day Thread Premier League, Cups & Euro Watch

They are, but we get South Madrid which includes the home changing room, and Spurs get North Madrid

 

no why would I bother when I already had a question.

I've no idea why spurs would need the away dressing room for security.

however knowing certain clubs and tactics I'd be quite happy to get home dressing room as it's probably far better

 

im assuming they know our fans will out number spurs ie milan final, no idea just a guess why.

 

the biggest reason of all to win this is to grind the wums gears.

crooks for example... apparebtly claims vvd is off cos he must play for only best teams.in world.

salty little spurs bitter.

 

no no cant be true, we keep being told the media are pro liverpool

 

strange isn't it.

Garry Neville
rio Ferdinand
Garry lineker

the list goes on and on.

hell alan shearer bared give us some credit and was brutalized for it.

I'm sure he will make sure to have lineker, Ferdinand and another Utd hack on duty. for the big game.

 

He is playing for one of them.

 

crooks wouldn't agree.

hence I know you MUST be right.

 

Farewell, Daniel Sturridge? How the true one-season wonder became a distant relic at Liverpool .
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/foo...relic-at-liverpool/ar-AABbyWo?ocid=spartandhp

 

UEFA Investigators Set to Seek Manchester City’s Ban From Champions League


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/13/...qMv996qD67o5c2Vmn0Rh0Nd1qkXdFXmx_TzQz4rM2c65Q

 

Well that would be pointless wouldn’t it
Not like they ever try in that comp lol

 

what i find a farce about that potential punishment is they can keep spending and spending in prem and eventually they will be within the ffp rules from buying the success that will earn them the money legitimately.

 

I understand why people are frustrated with it but it doesnt bother me.
As I have said before
It up to everyone else to stop them as far as I am concerned

 

i think other clubs might start spending silly now as obviously we can all see ffp rules are a load of bollocks, bet chelsea fans are pissed that their owner doesn't look interested as much anymore, and utd i assume have lots of money to spend.

wont be long before we all have 2 ****ing good teams

 

I never had a problem with Man Utd spending money (PL era) because they were earning it

 

exactly, i was just trying to think of clubs that would have funds available more than others.

 

This.

To reiterate from a number of weeks ago, City's biggest sale is £25m for Itchynachos. They are a club that has been able to let players like Dzeko, Tevez and Robhino go for peanuts and Yaya and Kompany wind down their careers (to leave on frees (eventually)).

Now City's team is obviously brilliant and the football they play the same, but lets question how they got there and how its all maintained.

 

In the interest of fairness, I feel the need to point out that Liverpool and Man Utd have had players like Carragher, Gerrard, Scholes, Giggs, etc that they've not had a income for. All top quality players that needed replacing.

Obviously, they didn't have to buy them but I'd argue Kompany was cheap enough to be considered part of that group.

 

I don't like how Man City or Chelsea are funded but it is what it is and we're have to get in with it.

End of the day, you can only field eleven posters at once. Man City are brilliant but not unbeatable. It's a big challenge that wool be very satisfying once Klopp topples it!

 

true. their pre plc days had foresight to build old trafford up.

since the glaziers took over they've been milked.