Nope, they spoke about the bet several times and G4E said 'you're on' to betting with HIAG. But G4E set the final terms and HIAG agreed to them
No, you're just trying to get him out of a bet. Very dishonest. The terms were laid out in HIAG's post. G4E accepted.
Exactly! All Pixie has succeeded in doing is dropping his man right in the ****, because I had actually forgotten about that wager!
There's no finally about it. HIAG set the terms and G4E agreed to them. Trying to sneakily change them later and now have you cheerlead for him is just welching.
Sorry Kips, but you are bang to rights on this. You agreed to G4E's terms, so anything previous to that is superseded by the final terms that you both agreed to.
Get a grip. It is clear what happened. Lots of bets evolve before the two parties finally agree. And HIAG agreed to G4E's terms.
Well they'll have to sort it out between themselves. But whatever HIAG and G4E agreed to previously was superseded by their final agreement.
I agreed to have a bet with Hiag, and then I set the terms of the bet, and then Hiag agreed to those terms. The terms were clearly stated. It was a simple process that any hot shot lawyer could follow. Is Hiag trying to use the “I didn’t read the terms of the bet” excuse and Welch? If Hiag is man enough to admit he accepted a bet but ****ed up coz he didn’t read it, and that he will still honour the bet - then I will pick a nice avatar for him.
Incorrect - I set the terms and Hiag agreed to them. If you see my signature I previously honoured a bet that I had with @Spurlock - so the only welcher is Hiag, and we all know that is the case as his fanboy cheerleader has arrived to defend him #pnprimmer
Having read the last couple of pages, and as an outsider looking in, all I can say is nobody draw up a contract with any ****s in North London
