Yup and without hazard in the team Chelsea are a far worse outfit. You can have the happiest squad in the wolrd bout if you don’t have quality players you won’t be a quality team.
I like how they’re advertising game of thrones on boards around ground... even though game of thrones started at 9 so anyone that wanted to watch it will be watching it
And you won’t, you don’t watch the team and only really discuss Liverpool with blue supporting family and friends.
Selling hazard would improve it, they wouldn't rely so heavily on one player (unhealthy) and they'd have funds to improve 'the team'
Don’t they have a transfer ban. No good having all that cash and can’t spend. Would also give chances for Hudson-Odoi, RLC etc.
Not 100% but thought it was two years. Could be very good for any youth players at Chelsea and a sort of blessing as they could only add that way. Could have a few more like the previous two I mentioned make the 1st 11.
Hoping it gets upheld mate. And I think you're right in that it would force them to look and the 3,738 youngsters they've got our on loan
jenas made a good point on motd. how else is a forward suppose to get a pen if they don't go down as refs wont give them otherwise.
