Have to worry about keeping players they have as well. Dont personally rate kane but def would have son and erikson. Be a few clubs looking at them esp if no cl football for them.
I’d take Erikson in a heartbeat. He’s exactly what we’re missing in midfield imo. Can’t see him moving if hazard goes to Madrid
Maurizio Sarri says £100m for Eden Hazard is too cheap, but he's powerless to keep him Sky Sports News reported on Monday that Real Madrid were increasingly confident of signing the Belgian this summer https://www.skysports.com/football/...rd-is-too-cheap-but-hes-powerless-to-keep-him
Yep and I have no idea how they finance such things tbh....billionaire owners have a different way of managing money than most of us or the corporate workd
and the wages do count to ffp. spurs have a decent outfit their issues are however stark. a) eriksen makes it all tick. he could move. b) defensively alderweireld is huge for them and he could go as well. Sanchez with respect to him isn't half the player no will he be. c) while they have secured others on long deals they are all samey... alli and Kane need service. the issue is winks in midfield is the only one who s creative. if eriksen goes. so they will need to spend just to stand still never.mind improve.
Liverpool rising star Rafael Camacho has rejected the club’s offer of a new five-year contract, Football Insider understands. The Merseyside giants have held recent talks over a new deal with the highly-rated 18-year-old, who made his first-team debut for the club in January. According to Belgian publication DH, Liverpool have made a bid for Borussia Monchengladbach’s Thorgan Hazard Although no fee has been reported, it has been claimed that their offer is believed to be higher than Borussia Dortmund’s €40million (£34.4m).
The Camacho thing seems to be true which is a pity, at the moment he's too lightweight but I was hoping he could work hard and be good cover for Trent next season. No disaster if he goes though jury is still out on whether he's good enough anyway.
Personally don't rate him. Not good enough to play as a CM and just isn't a RB. Only shame is we'd get the bare minimum for him, hope there is future % compensation for when he looks good in a **** league and some idiot PL club buys him for big money (only for him to be bang average)
Camacho thinks he is better than he is and has an agent in his ear. The issue for me is he is another dodgy trasfer for City when he was very young so he's been sucked into this who wolrd far far too young. They loan him out to get past the not supposed to pay for kids rules and then eventually he came to many city for a year. Then somehow we laid our hands on him after a trial. City must have let a lot of kids go. We've had him longer than they did. Its this simple: 1. guess who's interested... wolves. 2 Guess who is his agent... hmmm mendes 3. guess who part owns wolves? mendes so it doesn't take a mathematical genius to put 2 and 2 together here.
Is Hazards brother any good? Or is he dining out on his name? Think I've seen him once and thought the latter...
I'd agree. not the same level. TBh what I tend to do is just poke around the stats when they play big teams like bayern and dortmund etc. What I see this season is he's played most games for the munchers but his 9 goals have come v smaller teams and his 10 assists are similar. You'd need to have actually watched games to really then look at him. I felt at the time the cheslea thing was hazard himself making demands on cheslea to take the kid brother just because and it did him no career favours whatsoever. You could take a look and decide hey.. he's after filling out well and is a much better proposition now.. and that really needs a good look not just stat surfing.
No. He's **** Rumours have got to be bull, the fee for a start is ridiculous for the player he is. Feels like we're being used by his agent to drum up interest other than Dortmund, perhaps an English club who would pay more and offer bigger wages.
