Off Topic OLOF's political thread

Not really considering I was happy with reporting restrictions for linked trials for the Muslim grooming trials and for this case. If there'd been a Muslim livestreaming the cases and putting them in jeopardy I'd have thought they were a ****ing idiot and condemmened them. Equally I'm happy to condemn Muslim and far right terrorists. Seems a pretty obvious position to take.

Just answering.

 

Just as a neutral seen LL highlight muslim ****s and you highlight rightwing ****s,seems the same to me.You should be friends,you seem to have a lot in common.

 

We come on here and read the guff written by you and LL... and you think we haven’t a sense of humour

 

Mats had worse

 

Well if you could just try a bit harder to be funnier.

 

Nah, i’ll keep playing the straight man to your clown

 

Straight ? No never picked that up in your posts.

 

... so, you check people’s posts for clues to their sexual orientation

 

I was on about you not being funny,not straight,as in slightly funny,like now when your confused over your sexual orientation.

 

Corbyn's chat with Treasonous May, Corbyn says very little change.

She's got an evil agenda cos she's not prepared to shift on her deal.

 

I see they've greed to delay BREXIT by one vote. They just don't get it, do they? If they keep voting long enough they will eventually overturn the original referendum.

 

The use of the term "original" is intriguing it implies that there were others, or will be?

 

They've tried overturning the original (1975) vote. *spoiler alert* it doesn't go terribly well

 

I don't think they can legally stop a default "no deal Brexit" from happening, it's written in the A50 and EU withdrawal procedure.

There's a high court case going on at moment, they're claiming the extension May applied for, and got from the EU was illegal, and we did in fact leave the EU, lock stock and barrel on 29th March 2019...............The High Court Judges findings will be interesting, to both sides.

Juncker warns the UK Parliament.

 

That's what they are trying to do. Didn't they do the same thing with Ireland.

 

Details claiming why Mays application for an extension was / is / could be illegal.

Details regarding the Brexit court case part 2

 

Get your history right
It was a vote to stay in, or leave the EEC/common market, it wasn't legally binding but the winners got their wish even though there were lies and bullshit back then, Harold Wilson sent a pamphlet, just like the one Cameron sent (the one you didn't receive) to every household but democracy was upheld
There were less votes to remain back then than there were to leave in 2016

 

You are beginning to understand.

It’s called democracy.

 

Senile old ****, take your meds

 

But you and your ilk don't believe in democracy