The whole Building Seven issue has never sat right with me, the fact that it was omitted from the original NIST report, the manner of its collapse and the vauge wishy washy explanations of WTC 1&2 fell on it despite the fact that it was earmarked for collapse BEFORE Towers 1 or 2 fell. so what are people opinions on this??? Why did the BBC report its collapse 20 minutes before it collapsed? please log in to view this image [video=youtube;C7SwOT29gbc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc&feature=player_embedded[/video]
Watch this for a couple of minutes and you will understand everything. please log in to view this image
you're right..they destroyed building 7 because that's where they planned the attacks from..they had to do it incase they left a notepad with all the incriminating evidence around
nearly 200 jews were killed at the wtc, in line with the 9% of ny's commuting population thats jewish
No but whoever was dictating the events that day was also dictating the feed of information to the media and it would seem someone messed up and jumped the gun.
[video=youtube;zZrlNw-31R8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZrlNw-31R8[/video] In this video there are muliple reports by Firemen and news agencies saying the building was in imminent danger of collapse.