The official all things terrorism thread

Make yourself a cup of coffee mate, not sure if you take sugar, but maybe add a couple of spoons, as i said earlier, tuck the calulator away in the top draw bro

 

One of us is wrong or maybe both of us are wrong or maybe both of us are right.

 

Why couldn't you say the charges? I feel guilty now for saying mine

 

No one suggested otherwise

Selective reading?

 

The question wasn't directed at you mate, another poster made a spurious claim that he couldn't back up with "numbers " .
Go and find some "mad " gifs mate if you can't keep up.

 

I'll look for it tomorrow and post for you.

Injury wise, what timescales? Racist beat downs happen regularly

Edit: . It was the IRR. Institute for race relations.

I got the years wrong though. It wasn't the same period. That was until 2012 and as we know right wing attacksnhave increased

 

Well its the policy of freedom. Until someone has been caught red handed with plans or actually gone around causing terror, then we cant imprison/strip citzenship/deport etc (of all terrorist kinds).

Human rights and all

 

You are replying to yourself you schizophrenic loon ball.

 

Well atm it's just the word of a turkish businessman. That may well be enough for Sajid Javid.

 

It was an interview with a so called local by the reporter. The local was very clear about what happened, however, for now i will doubt his version of events until something more concrete is released. What i can't remember if it was the reporter or the local that made the 'court' allegation, and although it sounds a more viable version, i will not repeat it for now. The question i have in regarding your version of events, IF it was a terrorist attack rather than an attack for the alleged domestic reasons, then why were more people not killed?

Edit: Ok, reporters are repeating it now on TV....it was a rape charge <<< this is unconfirmed.

 

Where aare you watching this ffs

 

dark web called SKY

 

If true, then who knows. The turkish businessman story is on the BBC website obviously but who knows what's true atm.

 

Well we have all been there , out on the rape with a loaded gun.
The woman doesn't do as she's supposed to , sexual emergency then go shooting people on public transport.

A quick pray at the mosque a kebab and a 7 up then it's business as usual.

So deffo not terroristy more of a crime of passion?

 

I knew as soon has i mentioned 'rape' you would be on it like a ferrett up a fooking drain pipe.

ps. he wasn't out on the rape with a loaded gun, seriously mate get out that worm hole it's fooking with your head

 

You are a ****ing wormhole pal

 

She was asking for it. When she saw he had a gun she said '**** me'...so it's consensual.

 

You're in brb

 

So last night, white guy goes around tooled up with baseball bat and knife shouting islamophobic abuse, stabs a teenager - definitely not a terrorism attack

Turkish muslim shoots 3 people on a tram - definitely a terrorism attack.

You seem to have made up your mind already... and so objectively too.

 

That's a spurious claim. Can you back it up with numbers?

You're having a mare mate