Rangers v Celtic

That prick should be ****ing shot. Utter ****stain, typical Hun.

 

Dundee got 90+5 against Hearts the week before when they needed a goal[emoji28] [emoji23]

 

It's swings and roundabouts Mindy.

 

We didn’t see that game tho so how can we ****ing possibly comment on that you utter spastic!?

Jesus Christ this guy is thick.

 

Fact bombs hitting home

 

Hope you’re ok

 

Send thots n prares

Pls

 

How was your celebratories yesterday Bruv?

 

Genuinely no idea what point you are trying to make.

 

Ahem, There were only 5 subs = 2mins 30 seconds + 4 Stoppages = 4 mins 15 seconds = 6mins 45 seconds total...without taking into account Dundee's time-wasting.

Thanks to Aldo for the clarification.

 

At least we now know the whole Masonic referee myth has been well and truly busted

 

Is Bobby a Mason? Genuinely don't know.

 

by definition

 

Ok

 

My point?

6 minutes added on time.

Eddie-surprised
Me-surprised
Trev-surprised
Jim McIntyre- surprised
Every **** who seen the game who isn't a mad taig- surprised

You- The ref was spot on considering there was 6 substitutions.

 

4 stoppages!

How can this be?

John Beaton said to Jim McIntyre there was only 3.

 

I am drinking red wine now.

Ask me tomorrow.

 

That's not what you said though, you said Jim McIntyre had no idea where the 6 minutes came from. I showed you Jim McIntyre admitted to having been told exactly why 6 minutes had been added by Beaton, and you changed tack quicker than Sir Francis Chichester.

Jim McIntyre may have indeed been "surprised" but he knew why the 6 minutes were added because John Beaton told him as soon as the board went up, which is exactly what I said.

 

5 subs in the 90 and 1 during injury time according to the above.

Does the 1 in the 90+ not count or is the above in error?

 

Okelydokely