leave her there

Were they officially suspects at the time of that interview? Because I know when that happened the relationship between the McCanns and the Portuguese police completely broke down. The McCanns may well have thought, someone's taken our child and you're pointing the finger at us, fck off.

 

Why?

Why didn't you just take the batteries out?

 

IF that report is true, I think she should have been given the choice, answer the fooking questions or go to prison until such time you do answer them.

 

If you’d lost a child would your first thought be to find the child by any means, or withhold answers which could frustrate the process of finding your child?

 

The little girl was mentioned during the pizza gate story(fake news, yeah ok).......the parents were probably part of a Christian sect and the little girl has been handed over for sacrifice.

 

As has been said, there was enough to charge them with neglect and how did they keep their other kids ffs.

 

If you look at the link, the questions are 3 months after the abduction and solely about the McCanns. Like I said, the McCanns were openly criticising the police I remember when they became suspects purely because they felt enough wasn't being done to find their child or the real culprit. What I would do in that instance, well thankfully I've never been in that position.

 

Sources like the Daily Mail who iirc wrote a piece about nonces in Lisbon which is 300km away.

Luz is a small little village in a secluded cove. There’s kids playing out on the beach, promenade and around the old church in the summer months.

 

Pizza gate... Wasn’t that Cesc Fabregas?

 

please log in to view this image

 

please log in to view this image

 

They became suspects because there was more than enough evidence for them to become suspects.

 

Now that pizza gate tantrum made more headlines than the whitehouse one I wonder why .....nothing to see here move along

 

The Independent article details that the evidence turned out to be ambiguous at best. Sniffer dogs who were wrong and dna evidence also wrong? I'm not saying they shouldn't have been suspects, but if they were innocent and 3 months into the investigation, if the police are then laying the blame at them, and there was a genuine feeling among the McCanns that the portuguese police weren't trying and simply looking for an easy solution, they may have just shut themselves off. Didn't they hire private investigators (ex-Met police officers) around that time?

 

The link Quesadaad posted has reference to several cases in the area. I wouldn’t leave my kid alone either way, but if there’s known nonces breaking into apartments, I’d probably stay away completely, although I am going to Vilamoura this summer... I’ll remember to take my cattle prod.

 

Most murders are not committed by strangers as people think, i always thought it was mainly committed by family or someone you know ie a friend. So the parents in the absence of evidence, would naturally come under police investigation. Even 3 months on, they may well come back under suspicion.

How many times have we seen it, where parents have denied it until they are blue in the bloody face, only to be later convicted and imprisoned.

 

Yeh I don't disagree. I did say earlier, I don't think that they shouldn't have become suspects.

 

There is nowt ambiguous about DNA it's either the girls or not. I don't go with all this bolloxs of 19 components. It is very likely the McCanns as i explained earlier naturally through being her parents and through being in contact with their child and the environment the child was in, carried it themselves (DNA not body lol) into the car, but all this bolloxs about DNA components is just the prosecution frightened of making a move and getting undone in court. They've got the evidence is what it says to me but is not concrete to stop it being undone by a shyster lawyer.

 

It does say the Algarve rather than that specific area. And there's only one quote from an unnamed source from where they don't say.

 

Everything is made up unless it suits somebody’s theory.