Big issue with it is to protect the clubs and fans, should the wealthy owners pull out some of these clubs would have nothing and go bankrupt. Some like City and PSG are clearly state owned and tweak the rules to name their own stadium and provide sponsorship by others that is clearly themselves in a different guise. There needs to be a fair playing field and how you define all aspects of that is hard.
I think thats fair. "state" owned clubs should be forced to have even more stringent rules. I personally think theres now a time to limit number of player registrations at clubs. (from 17 to 35+ age) and there should now be a SEVERE clamp down on trading of players less than 17 (there is but only on dodgy sales, it should just be outright banned, if player wants to move at age 16 to another club then the should be able to do so if their scholarship is out of date but no money should change hands and the club taking them must prove no fees were paid to agents/parents.) PSG and City can invest a billion in facilities for all i care but they should have max 50 players and a wage cap for those 50.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47492004 When will UEFA start to protect English fans from these types of attacks. I could imagine English clubs getting banned if it were reversed.
yeah we know that, think pj point is why is **** all being done about it by eufa? as soon as English fans retaliate or do this ****e it will be instant ban!
They are also attacking our fans here in the UK. Why are UEFA not protecting the English. But would be first to look at bans if reversed
a Utd fan was stabbed by a taxi driver in France ffs. like come on... your id is known you ain't getting away with that. but when cheslea went there and 4 or 5 scumbags racially abused some poor French lad trying to get home on a train it was all over the news for weeks. there's clearly media double standards as if anything happens it should be reported and followed up on.
the one where you weren't sure whether TAA is better than Young or Mané is better than Martial? Sorry, I thought you were on one of your WUMs As far as I can tell you come out LFC win 4, lose 3, draw 4. So even with some very questionable ideas you can't get Man Utd's squad ahead of ours.
I clearly stated that on age alone i'd take TAA. I also stated that mane is a frustrating player so clearly you are on one of YOUR wums calling martial dross.
OK so you have LFC winning by even more. When did I call Martial dross? No chance I'd have him over Mané though. Mané PL goals each season: 14 so far, 10, 13, 11 Martial: 9 so far, 9, 4, 11
Yep, that's why I didn't take him seriously Trent: 10 clean sheets 6 assists 1 goal 8 conceded Young: 4 clean sheets 2 assists 2 goals 31 conceded
Astro: ten years of liverpool predictions 0 correct Mito: ten years of liverpool predictions 7 correct
Every year astro reckons you will win this win that win everything. Mito is the opposite. Common sense tells me mitos been more correct
So based on nothing but an assumption then that mito has been right more times. Im guessing astro got those stats from somewhere. You just made yours up
