leave her there

Exactly

 

I'm not advocating rescuing her, so it's a non-question for me, that's just your fantasy.

She chose to live with the animals, you should respect her choice or you're as bad as the animals threatening to kill her for it.

 

Do you do this purposely, twist words to suit your own narrative, where have i fantasised about rescuing her, i thought my point was clear even for a thick spanner like you?

 

You asked me how she could be rescued, you dopey sod.

I'm not "twisting" your words, I'm simply pointing out the implications or your view.

 

Let's try this again;

Do i believe she should be tried in the UK - YES
Do i believe she should be rescued from the refugee camp - I don't know how the law stands on that, hence in the meantime the law of the jungle applies and her life is at risk
The last i knew on the topic, was that she needed to get across the border and she didn't have the money to do that
Also the problem would be if we rescue one refugee should we not be rescuing other refugees that are UK citizens - I'm sure the Kurds would insist on that
My point all the way along was, if she could make her OWN WAY across the border, then she should be OUR responsibility, not that of Bangladesh

 

None of which conflicts with what I put, nor does it support your implication that those that don't want her back here are barbaric animals.

 

So, no condemnation of the barbaric animals trying to kill her. Talk about discrimination.

 

Yes, yes he does

 

Until today, I never used the word 'animals' - I have never used the word 'barbaric' - you are twisting my words so much, I'm having to check back what i actually did write!

I have never made implications that people that don't want her back are 'barbaric animals' again that is your own narrative, and maybe your own conscience creating those thoughts about yourself.

But let me make it clear what my implications actually were, that was that people were being discriminative, for all the reasons i gave in the past.

 

I'm responding to your comments, no twisting, at least not on my part. You seem to miss the reality that the views you're banging are not really much different to those of everyone else. You just seem to want to claim some moral high ground for yours.

Still no condemnation of the barbaric animals trying to kill her, which was the point that seems to be being avoided.

 

We dont want her back, its that simple

 

Why do you keep doing this to yourself.

Sit it out wee fella, you know full well that experience has shown you're simply not up to it.

 

I see no need to constantly refer to them as barbaric animals. It’s almost like you have an agenda.

However I’ll happily condemn them. I’m sure you have something very clever lined up for this scenario.

 

You forgot to mention it to your fellow dullard.

 

Why do i need to condemn the barbaric animals for your own satisfaction. I wouldn't think i would need to confess my condemnation of such a circumstance. My original point was based on a lawless environment.

Your own wording brings out the right wing views you hold, I can only assume you want me to condemn because you know the majority maybe Muslims. However, unlike you i was not looking at their religion but basing it on the laws of the 'human' jungle, in a lawless environment.

 

He does have an agenda. Like you i will happily condemn them, however, unlike him i will not condemn them based on religion or the colour of their skin.

 

How would you say the last hour or so has gone for you?

 

Have you not clocked what he's doing?