leave her there

Exactly. So why do we think we can apply Bangladeshi law to make the girl not our problem?

 

the reason for renouncing her citizenship is not because of a crime
it's because it would be "conducive to the public good"

 

we are not applying Bangladesh law
we are applying UK law - 1981 British Nationality Act

 

Bangladesh would follow their laws

 

His fat arse would be crying/complaining then too

 

'public good' is subjective and has not yet been proven in a court of law.

 

The legislation that would take her nationality way has a caveat that it can't be effected if that would make her 'stateless' - if she is not on a Bangladeshi citizenship list then our taking away her nationality would indeed make her stateless ... therefore our action would be illegal and we would lose ... simples ...

I think we are currently at home to Mr Cock-up ... or Sajid Javid to give him his birth name

 

not in this case
but it has been used before

 

I think Fatty should **** off off this thread considering he's got half the board on ignore.

I'm not sure I want to see his posts whilst he won't see others the fat ****ing pussy hole

 

And by your logic we wouldn't be able to refuse her entry as that would make her stateless. It would be nonsensical if the law had that effect. She is a British Citizen and our responsibility.

 

It’s an interesting topic this if you roll out the logic being used.

So, if you’re one of the many hundreds of thousands of U.K. citizens born here, but with one Irish parent and you are therefore able, should you wish, to apply for an Irish passport, but you haven’t. Does this current policy mean that if you’re convicted of a crime here, and serve time for it, then upon release you can be deported to Ireland? Or does this only apply to brown people

 

So what part of UK law are we applying, the government have made a decision based on what aspect of the 1981 act, please define accurately and not subjectively the line that relates to her case?

 

You know and i know, this only applies to brown people, and if you are muslim you are pretty much fooked. Pisses me off mate.

 

Section 40(2) of the British Nationality Act 1981, as amended, says that “the Secretary of State may by order deprive a person of a citizenship status if the Secretary of State is satisfied that deprivation is conducive to the public good”.

 

So you agree 'public good' has not been proven but used. Lawyers are going to have a field day with this.

 

Right, you politics lot can **** right off with your twitter posts, you’ve got your own ****ing hole for that ****e.... GTFO.

 

Not proven. They have then gone on to use Bangladeshi law, not UK law to make her stateless imho.

 

the Secretary of State just has to be satisfied

 

It looks like you're trying to get her here on a technicality.

She's joined a terrorist organisation and an enemy of the state. A decision has been made that she's not coming back. I couldn't give a **** what the reasons are for that happening. We should all be rejoicing that the little slag isn't coming back.

She's won **** all, neither. She wanted to come back here to be with her family and she's been told to **** off. That's a win for us, in my book.