leave her there
- Thread starter Rorschach
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
As what the car rental girl said to Steve Martin in Trains, Planes and Automobiles......Your'e ****ed..
Her parents obviously care a lot about her banging that drum and stuff.... So maybe they can go and join her and tell her the errors of her ways as loving parents do..
Great film!!
Get me a ****ING car
Right ****ING now!
Obviously wants to come here but if her family are supporting her she would have been better off in bangladesh from the off
Ask @Spurlock if he knows about lads who have family here and got deported to Pakistan. They living it large
British tax payer pal.
I mean I'm just talking here as she may rot where she is
But if she goes to Bangladesh, she will be laughing
Why/ how? If she’s officially been stripped/ set to be stripped of her citizenship then surely she isn’t Britain’s problem to worry about?
Why would the British taxpayer be giving her any money? She's not British any more.
No, it's a matter of national security. It isn't coming back here, as a result. This will be a lesson to others of that ilk that they cannot behave in this way and expect to be welcomed back. It would be a target here anyway.
Read what I said. If her family support her.
So her old man sends her money. Even a tenner goes a long way therr
That's his money, not the British taxpayer's. He can do what he likes with it.
Nah mate. I could be wrong obviously as she may bit go to Bangladesh.
But if this had been me I would have not bothered come back here anyway and gine straight to Pakistan and lived in luxury
Mate I don't care where they live it large as long as it isn't here. That's my point.
Oh right. When you said “we” I thought you were implying that Britain (as in taxpayers) would somehow be aiding her.
No idea, but it's still his money. She won't be costing the taxpayer anything.
He might get done for funding a terrorist, though.
I get that mate. My point is that if she goes to Bangladesh she has escaped any punishment or trial etc and will be free to do as she pleases
As a govt, is that the right message?
- Status