Always wondered what kind of ****wit allows their 12/13 (even younger) girl wear tight fitting bottoms with "JUICY" written across the arse
Goes back to what @Big Ern was saying about media Also what I said about Charlotte and Emma. On one hand you have the countdown to 16 and on the other you have outrage at someone saying they were fit
Primark sell or used to sell Jeans for 10 years plus called 'Girlfriend' might aswell have called them 'Blowjob in the park'
Law is ****ed in some places. In that there is no room for discussion to be had. It's a blanket no Think Bill Burr said it about hitting a wife or partner. Not that you should but by not allowing a discussion you get situations where the woman can do what she wants and retaliation means it's the blokes fault Had a case where the woman was hitting the guy with a saucepan and he slapped her eventually. He was wrong in law and she just laughed at him
How old would you say she looked saffy man. Deffo looks above the legal age. Glad im married so i can't get snagged by jailbait
Exactly it's society and on the one hand people embrace it then they cry about the long term results. I just thank God I don't have a daughter in today's world...**** that.
I do bruh and it's scary as ****. The kind of **** that gets discussed in schools now is ridiculous and to say anything against it gets you labelled
I know mate alot of people I know have daughters....it's a different ball game. I always say that if I had a daughter I'd be a different man...it would have changed me by now...male and females are different by nature, physically, emotionally and in every other way so as controversial as it might sound to our snowflake society...for me...a male and a female cannot be raised with the same skill set and now this transgender rubbish is trying to mix it up even more. All fukt up
Haven’t read all the comments but for me, yeah a girl can look 19 but surely the guy had to speak to her to get her to go home with him? When she started talking about Frozen and ****ing Pokemon you’d think he’d have got the hint. **** him the dirty ****.
If you know people will ignore the law anyway, are you suggesting not to educate them about safe sex?
So, are we agreed that neither are really guilty and the Media (sic Murdoch) and society are too blame?
Educating is talking or is it handing out condoms? What do the girls do with these condoms? Use them as Marigolds? Or does curiousity and temptation start to awaken a few thoughts? Are they mixed sex Education classes? Asking for trouble if you ask me. Did you need sex education? I didn't...it all just panned itself..dick grew a mind of its own and that's that..any idiot who is a human being knows the potential outcome of sex and that there is protection as a means to prevention of whatever. We know about sexual disease...we used to run around the playground accusing each other of having AIDS...we knew it was something to be avoided.
I take your first point but how exactly does everyone learn about contraception? I agree that injecting heroin is bad (and illegal) as we are always told but I'd be against stopping the providing of clean needles. I agree they shouldn't be handed out willy nilly (pardon pun) but if a below age teen confides in an adult that they're having sex what do you do? Tell them no (that'll work) or just let them crack on unprotected?