I mean, its not a deal breaker for me, per se. If they are hot, they are hot, regardless. But I would say i prefer long hair.
One of my contemporary favourites....Rita Ora please log in to view this image please log in to view this image
Yes to both ... although Rita does have the biggest muff I've ever seen please log in to view this image
I was doing the maths (33 - 19) film being out 2001 so presmably filmed in 2000. Anyway best case scenario shes 1985 and filming 2001 then she would just hit 16 . Saying that though she had no tits whenever ive seen her on screen
Remember seeing Jenny Agutter in Walkabout when I was just 11 ... ... not sure how old she was at the time but I was in love after she went for the naked swim in the waterhole
Yeah that hasnt changed over the years. I looked it up, she was 16, apparently minors CAN get naked on screen between the ages of 16 and 18 provided they have parental consent. Two prominent examples are Keira Knightley in the Hole and Thora Birch (who funnily enough was Keira's co star in the Hole) in American Beauty. That seems weird, a parent signing a form to say "Yes, you can film my 16 year old daughter naked!" I guess money can buy anything!
I remember her from the shower scene in American Werewolf in London. please log in to view this image
Whereas I don't approve of 16 y/o getting naked on camera, I would hope the parents did it hoping for it to help the girl's career, rather than for quick cash then and there. (although personally, I think it would be more likely to harm a girl's chance of getting serious roles in future)
