Assuming this is aimed at me (and not at Grove) then a scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world. Hope that helps, alko.
A theory is not a fact, end of. Stupid ****. Now, here is a fact:- https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/worl...-earn-35p-an-hour/ar-BBSuVLC?ocid=mailsignout
^^^^ Another dumbass who doesn't understand the difference between everyday theory and scientific theory (such as evolution).
I theorise, based on your postings on not606, that you're a bitter, smelly old ******. And that's the truth,
So scientific theories are no different from any other theories. Take some facts, add some speculation and come to a conclusion that is understandable and believable. Still, they aren't 100% fact are they. There is always that wee smidgeon of doubt eh? Even with one as substantiated as evolution. It can't be claimed to 100% fact. Not even by a spacker like yourself trying to justify his stupidity. Dumbass.