By the way.It was Spurs who had to show you dipsticks how to win a European trophy among many other things!
Oh dear, Saltypool have made Gollum angry by indicating they'd loan Nathaniel Clyne to Cardiff - only to change their mind and loan him to Bournemouth instead Do you think it was something he said?
He's a twat, but he actually has a point if what he's saying is true. They agreed a loan and he's found out when Clyne's joined Bournemouth instead. Not very professional or classy. Neither is having a cry about it to the media though, so **** the lot of them!
No doubt Clyne said to himself "On the one hand Bournemouth's manager needs a right back, on the other hand Cardiff's manager needs a slap..."
Remembering Bill Shankly. Shanks turned his Liverpool teams into racehorses and choppers. Thump....Tommy Smith...etc etc! But it worked! While down south at sunny Tottenham they continued to play football the Bill Nick way.That also worked!!!!! There must be a moral here....but I can't think of one...……..
Starting 2019 at the "top" in fine form ... https://www.not606.com/threads/vs-wolves-a.370574/page-28#post-12450993 Spurs and their "easy" League Cup draws. You know. All PL teams. An away NLD. Two games against the club who put you out. Possible game against the defending cup (and PL) holders. Might as well give us the trophy now, eh.
The lowest positioned club that we've drawn in the League Cup is a point behind the team that put them out of the FA Cup last night. Every other side is above them.
So, Klipperty has blamed the grass against City and now he is blaming the wind against Wolves . Definitely a clear case of Wengeritis.
Some utter gibberish being spouted here The following players were not available for the Chelsea game through injury Eric Dier (appendicitis) Jan Vertonghen (thigh) Lucas Moura (knee) Victor Wanyama (knee) Mousa Dembele (ankle) So **** off Norbert.
As money,today,appears to buy trophies,I remember,between the wars,Spurs were known as very tight with their money.Rarely bought anyone.I wonder who were the big spenders of that age? We won very little,while Arsenal won a lot. Coincidence?
If you voluntarily choose to start a game, away against a decent Wolves team, with a front 3 of Origi, Sturridge and Shaquiri, leaving Mane, Salah and the ladyboy on the bench, you've got no cause for complaint. Time for a new hat... please log in to view this image
I posted this on Hack Watch yesterday, and noted how they found a hell of a lot of people to spout the exact narrative they want (sort of like how it's always the Moggoloid waffling about "The United States of Europe" is always the first to get shows giving his opinion on every Britait piece the BBC do...)
I saw that and kind of dropped my intention to post it on this thread but forgot and so it sneaked out. I was surprised how many Spammers on KUMB were prepared to commit in writing to preferring us. As far as I know, no electrodes were attached to testicles or family members dangled out of windows. Then I thought about it...and it made perfect sense.
We've had tons of injuries all season, but it doesn't get mentioned because Pochettino doesn't use it as an excuse. We went into the games against Arsenal and Burnley missing three centre-halves and three holding midfielders, plus others. Despite starting a left-back in the middle and a box-to-box player and a playmaker in holding roles we won both and kept two clean sheets. Klopp's spent a lot of money and has a massive wage bill. He's been there a few years now and has had the resources available. If his squad isn't good enough, then it's down to him.
