You should change your name on here to Always Right but I believe it's already taken. By @alwaysright
Even though that is not true, look at the wording ‘Vulnerabilities in Apple’s password security’... how are you asserting that I’m wrong here, when your own argument proves that the software had flaws? You’re splitting hairs even if that guff was true, you know I’m right and you’re wrong, the security software is terrible.
As the article clearly states, the cloud was never breached. The fault was in Apples password system, which enabled hackers to guess individual passwords. They’ve since encouraged all users to up their password security by using two stage pass protection.
Yet clouds continue to be breached time and time again every day. Come on NSIS your argument was that it was safe, now you’re arguing over wording and terminology. Unless you massively misunderstand what you’re talking about, which I doubt, you have to admit that you’re not right here... it’s not safe at all.
The cloud itself is as safe as anything out there, imo. Provided you use proper password protection. No breach of the cloud itself has ever occurred. How the hackers guessed the passwords of the slebs they targeted, I don’t know.
You were certainly wrong saying it would cost United £100million to 'secure the services of' Pochettino. I'm prepared to state that is incorrect, should it ever happen.
That’s because you’ve believed the ****e they wrote. Not only did celebs get hacked but some of them have been hacked multiple times. You don’t know what you’re talking about here and therefore you’ll never admit that you’re wrong, despite being slapped upside the head with cold, hard, evidence, all you have is the equivalent of you saying ‘it never happened’. Forget it, we all know what you are pal.
Yeah, yeah... And you accusing me is as pot and kettle as it gets. I’m not wrong, in my opinion the cloud is safe unless you’re a celebrity with bad password protection. I’ve just shown that the cloud itself has never been breached, yet you refuse still to acknowledge it. Had it been,the details of 100s of thousands or millions of people would have been revealed.
NSIS has been wrong on loads of occassions, he just can't admit it. One of the best examples was when I pointed out to him (and lots of other Spurs fans) that they weren't the first Hotspur club in London. As there was already a club called Hotspur FC. And indeed that Tottenham Hotspur had to change their name to add the Tottenham part when the original hotspur club informed them. He and loads of others argued it wasn't the case until they turned themselves inside out on the matter. Eventually their own club historian emailed me with the info to confirm it. It was the biggest owning this site has ever seen. (NSIS will come back and claim I'm wrong of course)
It was yonks ago mate. On the old BBC606. I remember me and PNP going at it on there (as he was as stubborn as you) and one of the old BBC moderators stepped in and told us to 'knock it off!' Must have annoyed the **** out of those lot.
Back on whatever threat it was you said it would cost United £100 million to secure Pochettino. That one.
