I'm not blaming you. Next game you watch just do a quick count up of the type of contact that dummet made on salah. Then consider that if the ref gave a free kick for eack one of these contacts we would have to change the name of the game from football to foulball. I'm guessing you've never played the game...
Naturally wrapping his arm around his bicep and a cheeky pull??? Mate don't be one of those fans it's 100% stone wall penalty
it seems that Ref's go by the letter of the Law when it suits to punish us but allow play on when it would benefit us as I said re Kenedy last week
No. In reality the tug did not adversely impact on Salah. The tug did not impede Salah nor did it cause him to fall down. Salah dived/fell and the contact did not cause that to happen. Stupid by Dummett but Salah still cheated as he dived pretending he was impeded by the contact. At this rate we’ll have a non contact sport or 135 penalties a game.
Look at picture 3 in particular. https://www.101greatgoals.com/news/liverpools-mohamed-salah-accused-of-diving-vs-newcastle/ Can’t find a video yet.
Boxing day? This feels more like battering day. I mostly follow this team to watch the opposition's brilliance now
the thing is, they didn't need to dive and cheat but it goes to show how the ref can influenece the game
I played very well tbh mate Sadly my opinion is that the pens harsh but the reality and fact is dummet committed a foul in the box and salah said thankyou very much you one footed fool
Whatever mate Look again his hand is gripped around him and he pulls back slightly You think salah imagined hecwas pulled back and then went down so perfectly
you don't understand - the decision is 'In the opinion of the ref' the ref's opinion was that there was a foul committed because Salah dived not that he had a hand on his arm
Contact with someone doesn’t equal foul The contact has to have a genuine adverse affect on them to be a foul. Why do you think Salah exaggerated the effect on him?
