Waggy has scored again for the England Under 21's. This time he scored the opening goal on 58 minutes against Israel.
I'd give a **** if he was actually our player but he's not.we can't afford to buy anyone and his two goals alone have just bumped his price up. Another thing i hate is why do strikers take corners? I cannot get my head around that
Well if he does the business for us his price will go up anyway, and that is what we are all hoping he does arn't we. Just lets hope he can do it for us and we will worry about the price come January.
Muppet. He's our player for the time being and i don't care whether Accrington Stanley, Gretna or even Leeds own his contract until January at least he is ours and I hope he does the business in the shirt. You should be bothered as he is a Hull City player.
So you don't give a **** that he's in good form prior to his debut? And, in answer to your corners query, if he's better than the other players at corners, why not? Certain strikers aren't likely to have any impact inside the box from a corner anyway, depending on height, so what difference does it make?
No one knows what was agreed between the two clubs prior to Waghorn signing on loan. There was plenty of time to agree an eventual fee if we take the option to sign him permanently.
Good to see the lad is getting a few goals, hopefully that will continue for us in the next couple of months!
Seen as he will be a City player for at least the next 4 months then i'd say people have good reason to care how he is doing. Loan players may not be ours in contract, but they still pull on the shirt and try and get us a result, so should receive the same support as the rest of the team.
Now that the club have saved 5million on the Bullard contract there is more than enough money in the Allams coffers to pay for Waggy No.2 and who is to say what the price will be. Furthermore, does anyone know for certain if the clubs have not agreed upon a price already ? So unless you do its just pure speculation by us all. For now he is a Hull City player and thats all that matters. Why worry about January as there are many games to play until then ? Maybe the transfer fee has been agreed on a goals scored basis ? who knows but i dont see Waghorn going back to LC.
God knows how many times its been said, but... again. Money saved on Bullard will not be given as spending money!!!!!!!!!!!!
AND HOW DO YOU KNOW THIS THEN ? You a PA to the Allams by chance ? Thought not. Wait and see i guess. but imo i think they will - ok ?
He wasn't claiming to be their PA -_- over the last couple of months everyone has been saying that, didn't it come up in an official statement from Assem or AP? Tosser.
It was indeed stated by the club that the Allam's had taken Jimmy's liability out of the club wage budget and him staying or leaving would have no bearing on player funding. Though the fact that the Allam's no longer have to cover that liability might make them a little more receptive to spending a few quid if they think that the deal's right.
Players sent out on loan generally have a hard time getting back into the picture with their parent club, since Waggy isn't a Sven player he has his work cut out to prove his worth. His recent performances and goals in the England U21s show that he's motivated so this should benefit HCAFC. Of course if he scores a few goals Leicester will ask for more money, but that's the way it is.
