Off Topic Climate Change

Bloody hell, I've just caught up with the last half a dozen pages

Im not sure whether to sit here and continue to laugh or try and make my property more secure in case you escape from the institution you are currently residing in.

 

Another in need of validation from his perceived peers.

I wanted this discussion to be about the pros and cons of the science, others decided to make it what it is now, because they, like you are scientifically illiterate in all senses of the term. So they dragged it down to their (your) level.

Guess they all ran out of steam Stupid and lazy..

 

The average IQ on here (this thread) must be hovering around the 70 points mark, which is a clinical "moron" score

I'm no genius, not even close. I am only using citations, I am not doing my own research studies here, so all that is needed to "shut me up" is some good solid citations and argument... and not one has been posted strange given how much "evidence" there is for their "beliefs"

 

You've fallen into the same trap as the other idiot who pops in from time to time. You know nothing about me, other than what I post on here, so have no idea whether I'm capable of scientific debate.
Not wanting too or not being able too, are two completely different outcomes. At this moment watching you behave like a complete fruit loop is the only interaction I want with you

 

you're a bit of an idiot. I have an opinion based on your posts.

If you weren't looking for dopamine hits you'd make valid arguments. You don't make any. You're here to join the other betas in the little echo chamber
I offered, and offer reasonable debate, you lot prefer this to and fro, because you've nothing else to offer. Just admit it

if you had a clue about the topic, you'd have spoken up. I can only base my opinion on what you post, and you haven't offered anything I could call a point of debate.

Nothing I said alludes to me claiming I know you or anything about you. Your own posts give you away.

These laughing emoji, are they the new lol after every sentence? Why do you all post them when you are not laughing?

 

You claim I'm an idiot but haven't understood a word I posted. How can anyone have any kind of meaningful debate with someone whose mind is completely closed and when challenged can only insult?
That's the problem with you, the other idiot and Saxton. If we don't share your very narrow, one sided, blinkered views of the world, we lack intelligence. I get that you probably think that your continued university education sets you above others intellectually, but believe me, your rants on here don't support this.

 

It's the default position of quite a few to go personal when they're clearly ignorant on the actual topic and can't find facts to support their narrow minded view.

 

Aye, all of their posts almost, bar maybe less than 10 posts, in 14 pages, have been about me, not the topic. All salient points of debate, ignored.

I didn't start this thread, I challenged the OP to defend his OP, he declined, then declined any debate after his one attempt to provide evidence fell short

They're too ****ing stupid to see how embarrassing they are

Self awareness = 0

 

He’s an idiot and a sponge for right wing propaganda.

As you say, anybody who doesn’t share his often fantasy versions of the world, he tries to belittle.

 

It usually includes attempts to project their failings on to you. It's quite revealing. Watch which insults aimed at them they try to re-use. They're the ones that have caused a flicker of reality to shine in to their dark delusions.

 

That's a pretty accurate assessment tbh

 

Behave, you've been shown up time and time again when discussing topics you claim to understand. You and Sisu share the same delusion that you're intellectually superior to most, without ever being able to demonstrate it. Your only contribution to this thread is your normal whining.

 

On this topic of clisci, show me my delusion, please

or be a lazy spineless dipshit.. whichever

 

You've never got over being outed as a liar and ill-informed.

It's stung you bad.

 

Outed was he

I don;t mind being wrong, I never want to be an out an out liar

 

@DMD I have a valid reason for disagreeing with evidence-less claims of doom (I never claimed CO2 has no effect), it's called the last 100 years of scientific discovery.

 

As usual, only in your very small, limited mind. What was you saying about parroting insults. I outed you and saxton as liars a year ago. Since then you have been desperately trying to turn the tables.

 

care to show me how I am deluded on CliSci? or are you as witless as you seem?

 

It's why they try to had behind these piss poor personal assessments, they just can't abide being shown to be limited. When it happens, rather than taking on board the new information, the bristle and accuse people of thinking they're intellectually superior, but don't accept their own claims to being right are simply the other side of that coin, albeit lacking substance.

 

Rather than your usual mindless blubbing, show us how clued up you are and have a go at disproving his points.