Off Topic Climate Change

How many times are you going to use the "Triggered" defense

It's the left that gets triggered, we all know that, its even in your name.

Did my debunking of your claim with YOUR citation anger you?

 

This thread was dead, I bumped it up 11 pages in no time loony, you should be happy.


Happy Friday ****s, well to those of you with jobs anyway

 

Anger??

Me and a group of mates are laughing at you right now.

Next

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/...ical-report-heat-dengue-malaria-pollution?amp

 

Beta male? I wasn’t the one made to stay at home with kids while the Mrs waltzed round with your bollocks in her handbag mate So that’s yet more projection from the 40+ student

 

Ah the link spam

Read your link, then make an argument with it, or some data plot from it, all I see is you posting a link with no argument

What you are trying to do is standard social media nonsense, throw links at me you never read, then tell me to read it, and if I dont, then somehow you win.

and if I do respond with an argument, you ignore it and claim meltdown

When you offer a point of debate, I will debate, if not, then not. You've not even made a point here

 

Sisu still pedalling his "Climate change is fake news" bollocks ,I see.

 

This post really needs a graph.

 

If you dissect the gramoton and replace it with a frotwall it creates a chickchickchicken.

please log in to view this image

 

Being married, having a family, I don;t see the negatives, working hard, skilling up and going back to edu, dont see the negatives

Spending your life on a football board, with no kids, no edu, nothing, is really underrated I am sure

 

This graph shows that pecadilllos reinteract with the forcefield after shammon muthafucka

please log in to view this image

 

You're learning.
I haven't been reading your posts beyond the first line for days.

Still haven't worked out the purpose of this thread have you?
And that's with me spelling it out in plain English.

 

now you are deflecting from the salient point, you never read your link.

Boasting that you don't read arguments of others, well, I;d not boast about that. I can understand ignoring wum or irrelevant stuff

 

Hahahaha!!!

I have some drinking to do so someone else can keep this Muppet entertained

 

except you have to ignore my posts to make that claim, though I suspect you are just sticking your oar in here

 

You are not really laughing, and that is the saddest thing.

please log in to view this image

 

on a serious note: enjoy the beers mate, happy Friday

 

We went through this about 2 years ago mate, and you got laughed off the board and disappeared for a year in shame when you were made to look a helmet of the highest magnitude.

 

really, laughed off the board? 1 fool laughing at me, 10 fools, makes no difference, 0 sum game

You like them cant provide one jot of actual evidence for your beliefs

I dont even think you know enough to even understand what evidence is in this case

 

I didn’t say there was any negatives to being married with kids, what I suggested was that you were / still are, an emasculated noddy

 

You seem to think all married men are whipped maybe, but how would you know, no one would marry your ugly ass