This is all very straight forward. The loser of an avatar bet doesn't get any say in what their avatar is. You either take a straight bet or there's no bet. No ****ing around with the rules.
Reminds me of that analogy about idiots. Paraphrased. Never argue with Pussies, they'll bring you down to their level and beat you with their experience
See I don't want to come across bias...so will let the lads decide...but it's fair to say Piskie got done like a kipper on this one.
... the natural extension to that is that Quentin could therefore set parameters that guarantee him winning ... ... and being pedantic ...Piskie said he'd accept 'any bet' ... not 'any forfeit' restrictions put forward by Precious Noballs ... you have to first win the bet for the forfeit to apply Comes down to the same old same old ... Quentin is a very poor loser ... he cannot take the thought of anybody 'enjoying' getting the better of him ... quite sad to be so insecure, let's face it
Do you remember Quentin accepting my bet about us getting relegated then crying that he hadn't understood it when he lost? ... some consistency please ... #NoToNepotism ...
Did he lose? I don't think he accepted it. Plus, IIRC even if he had the bet would still be running, as, like Piskie, you worded the terms poorly.
This is not about you Fosse. All I said was Piskie got done like a kipper...my Betz for Bantz franchise comes with its own rules and regulations hence why yesterday during office hours I replied to Piskie 'i understand' 'im with you' or words to that affect. Lol
