Why has he been given a column in the Daily Mail just to snipe at Liverpool? I'd understand if his comments were relevant to this week, or this years news, but they just seem to be two pointless snipes at Liverpool. Odd things to write about, if you ask me.
Lets be honest here,Hes always hated us,he played for and won many honours with our enemies from up the Lancs. But hes a classless prick for using his new found job as a columnist and pundit to have a dig at us,shows we're still on his mind and that the hatred still burns brightly.as for his final words,many of "those Liverpool lads" are now multi millionaires and many are doing a similar type of job to what hes ended up with but to their credit they never slate his ex club or players. PS the Liverpool players that made ratboys schooldays and youth a "nightmare" never gloated at the Utd so called legends of the 70s and 80's that were'nt fit to lace our players boots.
The likes of Lawro and Hansen show how unbiased punditry should be, despite their love for LFC they are down to earth and surprisingly neutral- regardless of whether you rate their skills as a pundit or not. Rat face, on the other hand, is a classless **** and it sickens me that he is now a Sky pundit too. It's not even us who hate him, ALL footie fans bar the mank scum hate him. I wish him and his crap opinions would **** off back to his pretentios teletubby house. As for the Daily Fail, it's a joke of a newspaper so I'd expect nothing less from the manc brown nosers.
Thing is, Neville would do anything he could to stop us winning a title, including losing to a team purposefully like he claims we did. I think he's actually an ok pundit on Sky when he has to curb his United bias, however.
Suprised by Neville. I think he has been a very good pundit so far. Far better then Gray ever was and much better then the tedious brothers (Hansen and Lawro).
apparently you can tell how professional a footballer is by the colour of his suit - hope he's not looking for a career as a talent scout as for his claims that we went easy against chelsea - i remember us beating blackburn to help utd win the league but they couldn't beat west ham on the same day - some mancs even claimed that they didnt' beat west ham because they were sure we would roll over for blackburn - by the time liverpool scored the winner it was too late for utd to go for a winner against the mighty hammers
Neville is loaded with bile. We beat Blackburn to give United a chance to win it if they beat westham, and they lost, so, balls to what neville says. Funnily enough, we lost a lot of games that season and yet the chelsea game was thrown but the others we were just not good enough? As for the FA cup final, United were fking shocking and so were we, it was the worst final I can remember and james fked up and cantona scored, I don't know what game Neville was watching, but both sides couldn't string 2 passes together that day so much for professionalism
It's not a new trick is it: quote some "rumour" that lends weight to your argument and say "I'm not saying it's true, but...." That way you can deny any libellous intent but still sow the seed of the idea into the heads of people who want to believe it. You can even withdraw the comment, but the deed is done. Gary's hatred of Liverpool is born of jealousy and a deep-seated inferiority complex. As for the Mail, well, giving GN column inches to talk about Liverpool is an obvious way of drumming up a little cheap controversy to sell papers. Might just as well give kpr some space to talk about Utd. Where is kpr, by the way?
At the moment he's posing as a manure loving hack journo to try and infiltrate the Daily Fail newsroom...but apparently his views aren't controversial enough yet please log in to view this image
So the tit talks about liverpool players being obsessed with fashion and then goes on to mention beckham and cantona ! Yeah right, cos those two were a right pair of dossers who only bought their clothes from primamark! What a dickhead!
Actually KPR he's written it himself. Whether it's **** or not is immaterial but he has. I reckon you'd love it.
Fair enough RR, but that's very poor journalism from the Mail if true, they're hardly helping him in his career as a pundit are they, they're still playing on his "I hate Liverpool" persona, rather than trying to change the public's perception of him, and showing that he can be a sensible human being in some circumstances.
