Trump mocks Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford's testimony - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45727618 Dumpf goes on the attack against the venerable Professor - quoting the answers of his mate Kavanaugh rather than the victim. Easy mistake to make....... And his crowd scream support and wave their banners.......
I assume his rant is something to do with the saga that the venerable USC judge has been in the middle of, these past few days ...
So much to unpick here, starting with... * Bloke on the far right giving a white supremacist hand gesture * Bloke on the left cosplaying Hitler On top of that, here's some of the other visible slogans other than the "**** the NHS" one * A Star of David and "Jude" on the chest of the bloke doing the white supremacy gesture * "Enoch was right" on the bearded ginger bloke on the right of the back row * "Trump is my hero" on the shoulder of the bearded guy with glasses please log in to view this image For some reason the bloke in the "**** the NHS" shirt has deleted his Twitter. I can't think why... please log in to view this image please log in to view this image please log in to view this image
Next to F**k the NHS (same dude, same T Shirt) it looks like he either loves russia or is a spammers fan.
I just spotted the girl also has a Star of David and "Jude" written on her neck The bloke in glasses must be making sure she used the correct spelling, because he's definitely not leering at her in a rapey manner...
I wonder if Trump has cost Kavanaugh his nomination with his moronic (even by his standards) attack on the alleged victim of Sexual assault. Tactically it was a bizarre choice. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...-senate-reactions_us_5bb4be51e4b028e1fe398c13
Trump has to attack anyone that claims a Republican may be responsible for historic sex crimes. He knows he's high on the list himself.
Let´s hope Chelsea and Arsenal fans take banners with them to tonight´s matches that say "F**K Brexit"
Unclear as to what the "439 billion" means in the context of this : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:US_National_Debt_public_intergovernmental.png which seems to show a monotonically linear increase in both measured aspects of the USA national debt.
A cursory extrapolation of the main graph over time shows that the 29bn projected would be 3bn less than the graph predicts. Whether that is good enough for USA economists, or the claims by Trump as to what the overall deficit would be by when, I know not.
So the USD is about ready for a major crash, GOP economics ain't working. A major realignment is in the making. Buy gold or Chinese Yuan, you heard it here first peeps. Gold is currently under priced at around US$1200 an ounce. Got to be worth a punt.
The debt graphs are not going south for either of the UK or USA, regardless of how "good" businesses/individuals currently "feel" . Nor do they look as if they will significantly any time soon.
If you spend more than you earn on a regular basis, it eventually comes back to bite. Economies go up and down, as do currencies and precious metals. The thing with gold is that it is relatively immune from political fashion and/or political incompetence. Theft of it is about the only obvious downside, and it is bloody heavy to carry. You can buy about the same now with an ounce of gold than you could 2000 years ago, probably longer. Every so often inflation takes off in modern economies, particularly, but not exclusively when Socialist governments are involved. Inflation, which comes in many shapes and sizes, means that those who have been prudent and saved, pay for the incompetence or greed of others. When the brown stuff hits the fan, gold is a good place to be. So what I'm saying that I think that the laxatives are beginning to work and the dear old US of A might be needing a bed-pan sometime soon. You can only spend so much of other peoples money before it runs out, or at least the lines of credit run dry. Yes you can just print money, but look at that as the fan. And graphs from economists? If they had a hint of accuracy the economists would be investors, not economists.
