** STATEMENT REGARDING GLORY **

The complaints about 60 were slightly more than glory's. Glory was issued a final warning then I believe so rode his luck for two years.

I thought Glory done exceptionally well on 60s return considering he called for the ban so credit where it's due.

 

...how could I Jammy, I've usually got a pint in each hand...

 

please log in to view this image

 

.........very close, I prefer ale though

 

Is she wearing a see through?

 

why are people going on about this ban.it's not our forum as we may be members but are only here as guests really.
its not a political site we are not entitled to know diddly squat regarding bans or the lenght or even rules.
if someone ****s up they **** up.

 

Looking at Minxy's post about banning procedure it appears you and our other mods would have to specify temporary or permanent when it comes to banning.

Given that at the time you thought Glory was guilty of having multiple accounts I can see how you might have recommended a permanent ban. Once that was proven to be false however perhaps a temporary ban might have been more appropriate.

The evidence did change and has changed again over the last couple of weeks. No one is denying that Glory was always on thin ice and whether he crossed that line or not is very much your judgement call as the rest of us do not have all the necessary information.

Most of us I think would have been very supportive of a temporary ban given how we are all aware of various issues surrounding current and historical postings where Glory is concerned.

 

I can answer that one

60 used to always bite and by doing this kept overstepping the mark.

There were multiple times I asked 60 to ignore / not bite - I pleaded with him not to bite back but he kept doing it.

At the same time other posters got involved (l can't remember who they were, so lets call them lemming 1, lemming 2 and lemming 3).

Messrs lemmings were also complaining about 60 and his aggressive posting at the time.

When 60 ignored my final warning not to get involved, we had NO OPTION BUT TO BAN HIM.

 

Bucks, I had sent him enough warning emails

 

But IMO he was being provoked. Anyway that chapter is History now...

 

You're not fussy as long as its cold and moist...

 

Well said Wakey

 

Are you still talking about ale

 

Yes, agree, but he kept overstepping the mark whilst the other poster was the complainant.

 

We're talking about ale

 

I'm re-posting this, Minxy, as you haven't answered, other than to obfuscate by asking if I'm calling you a liar.

I'm not, but I might once I hear the answers. From my end it very clearly looks like you're trying to avoid answering. I wonder why.

 

Yes I am sure WJ

Your analogy is flawed in this context. To drop a bit of litter once and get banged up for life for doing so would be wrong

To continually drop litter whilst continually ignoring warnings to stop committing the offence and you leave yourself at the mercy of the powers that be

For the record I personally didn't have a problem with Glory and a quick check would show that I was 'liking' his posts right up to the time he was banned

At the end of the day and in the big scheme of things it's just a little footie forum.

First World problems of the highest order

 

I'm sure he said warm & moist to me .... must be mistaken

 

I was thinking the very same, but thought it better not to say anything