** STATEMENT REGARDING GLORY **

Banned for life? Let's start with Glory, then Clive, Bluememe, Leeds60, Sheldon .... need I go on?

Every single one banned sine die, with no reason given to the wider community. Even the Masonic Lodge is free-er with information than this. And if you've been missing out, you need to have a word with someone.

Our conversation happened. I can look back through my archive for you, if you need a reminder. January, 2016, as I recall.

The 'confidential aspects'? Easy. If you were actually to communicate with those banned, you might find yourself with a waiver to confidential information. Otherwise, you could explain by leaving out the confidential stuff. A simple 'x has been banned for 3 months for doing x,y& z, contrary to our terms & conditions. x warnings have been issued and ignored. The poster left the board with no alternative than to impose this ban'. Or something to that effect. Every last detail is not required. Your statement is a cop-out, Minxy.

 

Really? You sure? For this thread certainly doesn't back you up.

Imagine your proposal applied to the law. You drop a bit of litter, the Judge has a hangover so won't listen to your mitigation, you get angry, then all of a sudden you're banged up for life. You don't know why, your family don't even know where you are, far less why, and you have no right of appeal.

Not the best analogy, perhaps, but I hope I get my point across. Life bans for everything? No information shared with the 606 community? No chance of appeal? Others getting away with the same, & even worse?

 

Blue meme and Clive were known as a disruptive force from previous boards. The complaint's dropped In straight away via pm and for the good of the board they were booted. Ja and mot forum done the same and we all drew the same conclusion that those two accounts were made to disrupt leeds forums. I believe the ja606 mod's believed them or him to be man u fans.

 

If people complain we listen. You for one knew how lenient we were with glory maybe we should have nipped it on the bud earlier bit then we are accused of our zelious moderating. It's a toughy for sure

 

I have no intention of discussing Glory's case, as the point I'm trying to make is a generalisation for the good of the board.

HOWEVER, I cannot imagine Glory using the phrase “I fully accept a ban for content related issues”. Is this an actual quote, or a paraphrase? The reason I question it is that 'a ban' is non-specific, and alludes to a life ban. If he used the term 'the ban', it would have been in response to a defined term ban. He didn't, and I cannot believe anyone would agree to an indefinite ban.

I agree with the Google Mail account, for anyone banned cannot access the site as their IP address has been blocked (you assumed incorrectly, I'm led to believe). I know there are ways round this, but most of us wouldn't know where to start with a VPN or whatever. So even if a statement was posted (this one was the first ever), then it cannot be read by the banned person unless they have these circumvention skills.

 

Simply ignore this thread then, Einstein.

 

Blue meme was from the old bbc606,would wind people up,when they swear at him,he would report them to the mods.I told this to brb who also remembered him from the same site,so that's probably why he got banned so quick as well.

 

Exact quote sent to Elland via text message from his own phone

There was more than just that one line, but obviously I am sure you would agree, it would be wrong of Elland to disclose the entire contents of a text message via a forum, I believe he does not accept the dual accounts and he understand why it was perceived as bullying but he didn't feel it was, those are not exact words, just a general idea so nobody thinks I am trying to say he was accepting everything that has been said about him

In regards to the IP being blocked, I didn't know. I thought the gmail account would be good but I have no idea how that could be worked if an IP is blocked, I'll have to leave those tricky questions to the supermods

 

If i remember correctly Glory said he didn't want unbanning, so not really sure why we are on page 30 of this thread now, other than to pass the time

Mind you, I suppose we could always get Jammy to lend Dad his account to confirm this situation to be true

 

is that the whole quote ? Plus why are you with elland reading his phone ?

 

Amazing the amount of accounts that have been signed up for 7 years and hardly if ever post, but have looked in on this thread, come on guys, don't be shy, their a friendly bunch really

 

No not whole quote, I did say edit in progres as I realised someone might have thought I was claiming it was a one liner

Elland left it round mine on a sleepover, he told me it was an initiation test to become a mod

 

The drop his phone and wait for you to go and try pick it up ay.

 

Only if you get caught

Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk

 

It was where he keeps it that had me worried, I really don't understand why he has the sound turned off and left set on vibrate only

 

Glory was the king at PMs

Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk

 

True, I could do that, but as my great uncle Abert calculated that E=mc2, I'd need to travel faster than time not to read it........

If me posting on here with some home truths bothers you so much, why don't you put me on ignore or alternatively PM your mods to get me banned?

 

I can see why you like posting on here. It's a lot more exciting than watching a Cardiff game.[emoji6]

Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk

 

Glory has corrected my assumptions, by text, as follows:

"I did accept the ban' Not interested in the length. To read the ****e about the second accounts means I won't be back. I spent hours proving I was not Eric, and then they started again. The clear for content reasons quoted is because if they repeated the known untruth once morethe legals were involved. Brb confirmed no second accounts exist. It's time to drop it imo".

and ..

"You can still see the board if you log out & view as a guest. That's what the banned see".

I got it wrong about viewing the board whilst banned. I'm guessing my source (Leeds60) was trying to log i to his account, rather than going in as a guest. My apologies if I misled anyone, chaps.

But this is Glory-specific. The thrust of my complaint is the way this and every other banning is handled, as detailed previously. My questions will not go away.

 

True - well it used to be.

Sent from my laptop using my fingers.