#FreeSpurlock

That would seem to be the case mate, oh well.

 

Pixie came straight onto the thread called Saxton names and Saxton called him a racist.

Pixies only contribution weeks later is to ask why he was called a racist .
Others go there with the intention of getting banned .
Stan lives to be an annoyance so will constantly get banned.
Nsis is incapable of posting without a rage filled insult rant .

 

Saxton hasn’t been banned since the no abuse rule came in, despite being abusive. Welcome to the point.

Oh and GC has posted on it.

 

Saxton has not been banned by DMD. God’s Cock posts regularly, he just keeps changing his username as he tries to bury his drunken **** ups and DMD is regularly abusive.

Anyway, I wasn’t abusive the other night but was banned anyway as DMD was windmilling. There’s a reason why “those looking in” voted him King ****, despite the fact he posts the vast majority of his comments on one thread.

 

No he didn’t, that’s completely incorrect, try again.

 

Saxton was banned when Colin Lee reported him which is what sparked the whole thing off.

 

Who didn't do what ?

 

Not by DMD

 

Does that make a difference?

 

Very much so. In fact it completely destroys KC’s claim. Why did brb have to step in? What was the ban happy mod doing?

 

@PISKIE didn’t arrive on that thread and call Saxton names, before Saxton called him a non stop racist.

Yet Piskie got a week long ban for questioning the call to not ban him. He then got banned again for calling Saxton out and telling him to prove his assertion or withdraw it. Which made the rule and therefore the thread a complete joke.

 

He’ll continue to defend his fellow bigots.

The Truth isn’t allowed to interfere with the chosen narrative.

 

Maybe you can trawl back to where that happened, from what I recall Pixie came out with fat racist garage nonce or something to that effect .


Why did you tag pixie you cock gobbler?

 

I'd have to check, but I seem to recall I did block Pete from posting for a while. I blocked brb too.

I know for a fact I've warned Pete and plenty of other posters, who all took heed and moderated themselves accordingly, others couldn't manage that, and continued to be abusive and/or disruptive, which includes comments on modding, as there are/were several more appropriate places for that.

As ever, you really don't know what goes on, and comment based on your own misguided assumptions rather than reality. You not knowing, is not the same as something not happening.

 

End of the day if you abuse someone directly or indirectly...expect it back. Funny ****s trying to define what is abuse and what is 'the truth'

@DMD has got different rules depending on who you are therefore he loses all credibility

@brb sits back and allows it because he likes DMD fighting the battles on his behalf because Brb knows he can't really be a site owner and carry such views and DMD uses it to serve his own purpose.

Is it ok to call fat **** Pete the exact same thing he called Piskie?

 

Nope.

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-6329#post-11973071

 

Oooh look, here's another clown that posts with only half the information, but it suits his own biased agenda.

 

Explain why I was banned yesterday

 

There doesn't need to be any imbalance - or even questions of imbalance - if no one's banned/ has posting ability removed. This is the point I've been trying to make (and why I'd make an excellent Prem Board Mod might I add ).

If people want to complain about abuse on the Prem board then they should just be told to grow a pair. There's plenty of boards on this forum where rules and guidelines are in place to protect people who don't wanna be called a **** every five minutes. This board shouldn't be one of them though.

 

Good read this.