#FreeSpurlock

Don't buy in to the fake news narrative. People can do all that you suggest as far as free speech and the law allows.

There is one single thread that gets a bit of moderation, because Tobes and a couple of others requested something was done about the abuse on there. Nobody is banned from it.

 

I think you’ve nailed it. The irony is that the biggest **** on the board is the mod who is censoring any post that he’s scared of. He’s already been voted King ****, he’s not got anything left to prove.

 

yet you have allowed someone whos posts openly break the racial and religious hatred act, to continue posting the same stuff without any reproach.

 

Can you quote when you reported these posts to me so I can see what's happened?

 

I never requested it, so that’s a fake news narrative right there.

I did say I had no issue with it though and I complied with it, until you chose to apply the rule in a completely biased and unreasonable manner.

There’s been numerous posters banned from it, as you well know, the fact that those bans have currently all expired is irrelevant to that fact.

 

Can somebody check the politics thread to see if @petersaxton has either apologised or retracted his lie that I’m a ‘non stop racist’

Thanks

 

Brilliant!

“So Mr ****, you were in charge of overseeing things?"

"It's King **** and yes, I was, I had the power."

"And you saw the offences being committed."

"Yes."

"You were present when some of them were committed."

"Yes, I was present but I was not involved."

"Why didn't you do anything about it?"

"No one reported it to me."

"So you were in charge of overseeing things, you were aware of the offences being committed but your defence is that you did nothing about it because no one reported it to you?"

"Yes, stop wriggling and deflecting, it's funny as **** when you do this, I barely listen to you as you have nothing to offer."

"Are you an actual ****ing idiot?"

"**** YOU, I WIN!"

 

The utterly juvenile nature of this comment made me chuckle.

 

No thread on the Prem board should be moderated. Club boards understandable. This place is different.

I don’t particularly read that thread but the idea I get is a lot of lads are pissed at one particular poster for their supposedly - I say supposedly as like I said, I don’t really read the thread - racist views and the fact he’s seemingly being protected.

Personally, I’d let the poster continue his posts, equally I’d allow the other posters to throw the kitchen sink at him if they choose too.

As I said, this is the Prem board, no one realistically comes here for serious discussion and everyone knows the deal, it’s the 18-rated area of the forum, the rest are generally PG with one or two sections aside, let it descend into chaos because that’s what the people want - and I’m a man for the people!

Let Dier Hard #MakeNot606GreatAgain

 

I can't believe you wrote that!
<whistle>

 

No chance of that happening. The dictatorial so called mod has been given a little bit of power. He’s so insecure that he’ll hang on to it for grim death.

 

Now I could vote for an utter **** like that!
#bringingbackthecunt

 

^^^ Fat Pete sympathiser.

 

There seems to be some confusion between not being abusive to one another and posting comments that you find offensive .

Example.
"PNP you are a sanctimonious boring ****tard of the highest order "

This is an example of abuse and would warrant a ban .

However posting an article about lets say South African children selling barbecued rats on a stick may be offensive to some , but it's not intended to cause offense .
The reader choses to be offended on behalf of the South African rat chefs.

The people that get banned are all the most offended but guilty of dishing out most of the offensive comments.

Pete existing is offensive to them so they are In a constant state of triggering.

The only way they can relieve this is by calling him a bigot Nazi nonce fat old etc then they get banned and that offends their circle of offended butt hurt pals.

It's not hard to not abuse people on one thread but some seem incapable

 

I don't really know who that is.

I never go on the politics thread.

 

Complete and utter bollocks.

 

You got banned for being abusive .
Tobes hasn't been abusive and hasn't been banned.
Do you not see the connection there ?

 

I kinda get what you're saying, Duncs.

My calling Fossy "Bambi" offends him, but it's not abusive. Most people love Bambi (the cute baby deer, not the dorkish twat who posts on this forum).

Same with Pixie.

Just because I picture him as a green-clad sprite, prancing like a tit among the flowers and getting butt-plugged by elfs, that might well be offensive to some, but it's hardly abusive.

 

I wasn’t abusive the other night but I was banned. Pete has been abusive a number of times but doesn’t get banned.

Just the facts.

 

Firstly, Tobes has been banned. Secondly, as has been constantly pointed out, it’s not the fact that the thread is modded ( although that is stupid enough on the free for all PL board) it’s the blatantly biased way that it’s applied. Where Fatty Saxton is allowed to do as he pleases whilst others get banned for pointing out the blatantly lopsided application of Dull’s so called moderation.