Which side was better: Arsenal's "Invincibles" who won just one trophy in a very weak Premiership season and subseqently failed to defend their title the following season. OR Man Utd's treble winning side who won 3 trophies in one season and lost less games in that season than Arsenal's "Invincibles" despite the oppostion being much more competitive.
If the Invincible's were so good, then surely they would have conquered Europe as well as scooped a domestic cup? Sorry, but United 99' play them off the park. And then some.
Hence the use of the speach marks. The Arsenal "invincibles" were a complete myth, the only team to really go a season unbeaten were Preston.
"Invincibles" lol. true invincibles are sides which have won the biggest trophies. how many european cups does london have again?
jonty, sort your life out mate you inbred little ****. go and asphyxiate yourself while knocking one off over your dad.
lads don't lower yourself to his level, just report it and the posts will be deleted. If someone is acting a knob I can ban him from a team forum.
