The £18 mill wasn't my figure originally, the £7.7 mill is in the YEP today and I never said how much was sold to the 49ers but yes its 10%, which values the club at £100mill and proves my point. BTW YGM
So according to you,Rad has wasted billions on crap players,but spent no money and pocketed it all.Are you Diane Abbott ?
Do you understand what income and expenditure are? and that when income is greater than expenditure this is usually called profit? Lets try this? Chesh bets Glory £10 on some thing and wins. Chesh Bets Glory £20 and losses. Chesh - Income £10 - Expemditure £20 = Chesh made a loss of £10 Glory - Income £20 - Expenditure £10 = Glory made a profit of £10
I am positive there is a big sell on because Bournemouth paid initally £6m but at the time it was stated that with add ons we would get at least 10m
According to TCs numbers we spent £34 million I think it was,and now another possible £15 million,that's £49 million spent,so just show me the income bit from sales,I will start you off,£12 million Wood,£5 million Taylor,£6million Cook,£4 million Byram.£3,5 or 7 depending which one you believe for Viera.To help you out lets say £7 million.That's £34 million income and £49 million expenditure. In Cheshire schools that is £15 million spent.Show me how it works out in fairy land.
It could be a profit from the sale of an asset so your income could exceed expenditure but your trading profit could show a LOSS
