It's a shame but obviously not in Bielsa's plans and good for English players to actually get some overseas playing experience,
Wrong. Unrestricted roads have the national speed limit applying (60MPH). As you enter any other speed controlled zone you will pass signs indicating the speed limit applying, and you leave this area you will pass a circular white sign with a sloping black bar running through it this advises that the national speed limit applies. You wont see another sign until you enter another speed controlled zone. Repeater signs are only ever present in speed controlled zones. https://www.askthe.police.uk/content/Q594.htm
You realise that GWR is never wrong he said that AR would spend no money well of course he has got them all for free he is an amazing owner Vydra proved he was one greedy so and so I thought McContract was greedy he took it to a new level along with Hernandez I hope he doesn't have racial problems in Moscow because money won't get you out of that
Indeed Rad is selling Viera for exactly what Bamford is costing... Nett spent - £0 again and GWR again. Oh and this might help you. https://www.askthe.police.uk/content/Q594.htm
If you see streetlights it’s 30 unless signage says different. If you don’t see streetlights or markers its the national speed limit. The reason the national speed limit doesn’t have a number is: - It depends what you are driving, car/van etc - it also depends if it’s single or dual carriageway If you are driving a car it’s 60 single carriageway and 70 dual carriageway. Dual carriageway is not about the number of lanes but whether there is a raised barrier/verge between the lanes. So 4 lanes (2 in each direction) but no verge =60 2 lanes (1 in each direction) = 70 No I’m not a traffic cop, yes I have been on a speed awareness course.
Bamford according to sources has signed and when you think the money has come from Viera sale brilliant bit of business AR Sacko has been loaned to the club we played on Sunday
I based my 60MPH on the belief that Mike was transporting Moe in a motor car and not in the back of a car derived van ot truck where 50 MPH would indeed have been the speed limit. I know the road the offence occurred and as your parameters indicate it is not a dual carriageway. The point of me replying was so that someone actually told Mike don't make a cnut of himself on the course as it will mean a trip to court. He needs to say yes and no in the right places and suck it up.
No that's what I said. You mentioned 30 unless signed differently with repeaters place on the highway.
i will repeat all roads are 30mph unless stated otherwise for instance coming outta mirfield on the A 644 it is 30 then you go thtough ravensthorpe still 30 then when you pass the old dewsbury fire station and it then becomes a dual carriageway and guess what it is still 30.
and I will CORRECTLY repeat that the national speed limit (clue is in the name) is 60 MPH for cars with other speed limits always being signed. in a legally complaint manner. You wont see signs on unrestricted roads saying 60MPH because this is the default maximum speed limit on UK roads.
Just catching up with the rest of this thread. How many millionaires does it take to drive a Rolls Royce at the National Speed limit in Bradford?
It's actually correct fella. Definition of a dual carriageway is a carriageway that has a 'barrier' of some description (higher than paint!)... so if there's only one lane in each direction but some grass or a kerb between them. then it's dual carriageway and you can drive 70 in a car. Where i live there are a few bits of road like that and a stretch of road that is 2 lanes in each direction but no kerb or verge in the middle... so that bit's 60. Nobody has a clue.