2-1 France, unimpressive. Given that both Peru and Denmark are likely to be better than the Aussies, who had a lot of heart and not much else, this group might be interesting.
France had a “good’” bad day. They played poorly, the Aussie’s deserved a draw, but France won. C’est la vie!
Please forgive the question, but is there a point to all of this? I don’t understand why you bother with these silly little spats. I recommend taking the piss, being a tad patronising (that’s talking down to people) and appearing ever so slightly mental. It’s working for me - ask Stroller.
Why should I need to have different treatment than others? Nobody else gets told not to carry on “silly spats”, do they? Those ‘liking’ your comment are amongst those who carry on debates endlessly. Sorry, but no. I’m entitled to my opinion and to defend that when I’m told to ‘get over it’ or accused of telling others that they can’t love a certain player.
Interesting American article on the “insights” of the World Cup. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/...atch-world-cup.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur
And when I post something that isn’t defending my OPINION then you can say I’m carrying on a spat. Until then I’m simply defending my opinion against people who disagree.
Whatever. This isn't a court of law. You take this forum too seriously and seek provocation when none is necessary.
I wasn’t the one that told people to ‘get over it’ for simply stating their opinion, mate. If you want to try stopping that, don’t just pick on those you disagree with.
Thanks for the advice mate, I'd love to continue bickering with you Willy but I have to go out now. Have a great afternoon.
