What difference does it make you ****ing imbecile?!? Politicians lie. I've said it twice already. It does mean your madcap, fantasist, ****ing loony theories are in any way correct. God give me strength!
"it is highly unlikely that the steel at the WTC experienced temperatures above the 750–800°C range" Did you not just prove the point then?
ST, your answer "politicians lie" would be an acceptable answer if I asked you the question, Do politicians lie? The question that I did infact ask was, and I quote, "Can you honestly tell me that you believe 100% what they told you about 9/11?" Answer a. yes - I believe everything they told me about 9/11 b. no - I do not believe everything they told me about 9/11
So you have basically said what I have said. The actual fire temp could not have heated the steel beyond 700 - 800 degrees. But there is footage of melting steel cascading down the side of the tower. what was melting that particular area of steel Those steel balls could not just be there in 1.2m tonnes of rubble. they are formed in a very specific way, not by a massive building collapse
Do I believe they lied? They most certainly lied AFTER the terrorist attack. They took advantage of the situation to push through right-wing legislation. Do I believe they lied to cover up some huge conspiracy? No, because I'm sane
JFK was killed by the US government, Al Quaeda doesn't exist, the CIA are responsible for heroin production, the holocaust figures were exagerated, to name a few though I'm sure you've banged on about more. You told me the NIST have a new theory and that you've done hundreds of hours of research. Why don't you just tell me what their revised theory is now that the pancake was theory was proved wrong?
Are you a politician ST? Answer the question,, its a simple yes or no asnwer, I didnt ask you if you think they took advantage of the situation after the attack. Its very easy DO you believe everything they told you about 9/11. Yes or No
He asked a question who flew the planes? How the **** am I supposed to know. Just because you find holes in the official account and demand answers doesnt mean that you should be expected to the provide the answers, all you can do is show possible scenarios to how it could have played out differently to the official account
Thats copied from a website that claims that the fire could have been 1000 degrees. What I said in the 1st place. So you say there no possible way that balls of iron or steel can be formed in 1.2m tonnes of rubble. No chance at all? Also the pentagon crash. If it wasn't a plane where the witnesses also in on the conspiracy. Did any witnesses speak about seeing anything else that wasn't a plane?
Is this insanity still going? Seriously, what would the benefit be for a Western government to destroy one of their most important financial centres? I can just imagine the meeting of the joint chiefs of staff. "Shall we blow up some buildings using the most elaborate plot ever imagined and blame it on some fanatical Muslim nutters?" "Sure, why not?"
No, the balls happens through melting and rapid cooling only. When in a destructive environment steel will sheer and there will be small shards. Like iron filings etc, not balls that give all the appearance of something that was shaped by its own surface tension
as I explained already before, they are possible scenarios. You have yet to provide a credible arguement ST for all your "you talk nonsense". For someone who acts like they have a superior intellect you come across a bit clueless most of the time. My guess is your lack of constructive contribution to the debate is to do with a complete lack of any knowledge of the issue. If so, butt out
I fairly sure if America wanted to invade Iraq they could have found a far less contrived way of doing it. They had plenty of opportunities over the years before even the first Gulf War. It was alleged by David Yallop in his book "To the Ends of the Earth" that Saddam Hussein paid Carlos "The Jackal" to carry out the OPEC attack. Although Carlos has always said it was Gaddafi; he's a lying ****. You are a sad Not606 version of the Unabomber. Although instead of having an isolated log cabin you're sitting in a child's Wendy house with a laptop, furiously ****ing and posting pictures of melted steel.
You admitted yoursel that you think CIA where involved in the murder of JFK Al Qaeda does not exist as an organistation, until there is proof of an organisation called AL Qaeda, I will stand by that. CIA are responsible for heroin distribution. Not production. I never said the holocaust figures where exaggerated but Zionist jews do have a habit of exaggerating offences against jews. http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/
