Yes, it is an error because there’s one official man of the match. It’s a betting market- Rudiger was the winning bet.
Bollocks! His opinion is no better than anybody else’s. Clearly your pea sized walnut which rattles around in your cranium isn’t able to think for itself and needs a so called official to make a decision. You’re ****ing batshit crazy.
I don’t know why you’ve dug yourself this hole. If you want to pretend Kante got the award, I won’t stop you.
There's no hole here, just you frantically digging yourself in deeper pikey. I watched every second of the game and I thought Kante was by far the best player on the pitch. Funnily enough so did almost every other football journo's and sports news outlet's but don't let that stop you digging...no siree.
No, Rudiger played extremely well as did all the team. It was hard to pick just one player but at the end of the day it's all subjective. I'd imagine thats why journo's went for so many different players.
Calm down Just quoting an article that says he ain’t coming. I’d still take him on a free though. Just to stick him on with 5 mins to go when we need to play hoofball like Mourinho.
We don’t play hoofball blud. Hence why we might look at a beanpole if we needed an option. You’re ain’t got your flow going with this wum have you
