Paul Power. Fair play to City for having all that money to spend and they have spent it. It makes things more competitive. The only gripe I have with City is this supposed naming rights deal of £400 million. That has to be investigated, for marketing purposes as its obviously unrealistic and if it it goes through, it makes a mockery of the FFP. Real Madrid who have a market value 1000 times greater than Man City cannot attract naming rights as high as that. A more realistic figure for a club of their stature would be a figure like Arsenals of £150 million. City like Arsenal have never been European Champions, and thats what dictates global marketability. Marketing wise City are a small club in Manchester, in the same way Arsenal are a small club in North London,.
City have the better squad and players- but United trump them with a better manager. United will win. Would rather City won.
Man City are one of the poorest football clubs in the league. As a club in their own right they are worthless. A stadium they dont own, players they cannot afford, wages so stupidly high they will cease to exist should their owners ever have a problem like the ones many rich middle east tyrants have had this year ). there owner is loaded, Man City are bankrupt and worthless.
Ok, so how are you measuring it? He says City have the better players/squad, you say United, so you both need to prove it, since you claim he is wrong and you are right.
Very, VERY easily. Trust me, two games do not make a player. Two seasons, plus even more improvement since the start of the season (I'd be happy if he could have maintained last years level of play,) do. After seeing Anderson for years as a spectator on the pitch, two games will not make me think he's even average.
