Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

It depends on the deal done. Most clubs get a share of the profits after a set number of shirt sales has been achieved, with all of the shirts sold before that figure is reached going to the manufacturer

 

Who gives a ****

 

Yep I'd imagine this is true. Sort of like bonus payments involved in transfer fees when players hit a milestone etc.

@Diego - that's a very poor wum attempt mate. I know you're trying your best to justify that Pogba transfer fee but you'll have to try a little harder I'm afraid.

 

So how much are United getting from the Pogba sponsored Cushelle sheets?

 

So you genuinely believe that the official kit manufacturer of every club gets all the money from sales?

 

Liverpool transfer news: James Maddison on verge of signing with Ryan Sessegnon deal close
LIVERPOOL are reportedly closing in on deals to sign Norwich and Fulham wonderkids Ryan Sessegnon and James Maddison.
https://www.express.co.uk/sport/foo...ich-City-James-Maddison-Fulham-Ryan-Sessegnon

 

If that is true then with Kieta coming in that will be our business finished very early. Think Sessegnon is more likely to stay in London, we might get Maddison though

 

who knows.

sessengon might stay at Fulham next year if promoted tbh and will cost a bomb.

no idea if these guys are really links or not.

I would expect however we will try to get non wc deals done asap but I fancy it will be tough to get players we want to move before wc starts

 

As I've explained, the kit manufacturers take home sales but pay clubs for the contract. The brand is in charge of designing, manufacturing, distribution and sales. This is what is included in the kit deals. Within those contracts, as Tobes mentioned - clubs may have clauses which upon being satisfied, require fixed payments. These will include target sales figures, perhaps commission on club shop shirt sales (in the form of a discount for large stock orders).

I can really break this down for you if you're struggling with this Diego. Clearly this forum is a mixed ability group (at least when you're on it).

 

Go on then, it should be an interesting read. Try to be specific with clubs and manufacturers though so I know who has the best deal

 

United - £75m per season
Chelsea - £60m per season
Liverpool - £60m per season
Arsenal - £30m per season
Man City - £20m per season

This is not including shirt sponsorship (logo on the torso of shirts) and sleeve sponsorships.

 

Not really boke it down there have you, thought you were going to show me how manufacturers get all the sales monies

 

Quick question, how do you think this all works? You think Adidas pay United £75m a season just to what? Make kits? Wouldn't that be based on the sales made? (If by your logic, United were in control of sales)

 

You really struggle to read don't you, where have I said Adidas pay £75m just to make kits?

 

Oh looks like The Guardian did this for me: https://www.theguardian.com/football/the-set-pieces-blog/2016/aug/24/transfer-window-market-myths

Here is your breakdown. @Diego

 

I was merely taking the piss out of your poor use of logic by applying it the other way.

 

Did you read it? Turns out the manufacturers don't get all the money from kit sales

There figures are a bit out too

 

Oh, is that what you were doing

 

You do realise that despite this being put out there a while ago by few sources and widely accepted to be the case, Diego still won’t believe you. Only way you might get him to believe you is if you get Fergie to come tell him face to face and even then he’ll get back out of the argument

 

I didn't actually say they don't get any. You asked if they don't get any and I never said yes or no. I explained the fixed fee plus bonuses/possible commission (which turned out to be the case)