Watch out, manspreaders: the womanspreading fightback starts now Radhika Sanghani https://www.theguardian.com/comment...spreading-fightback-metoo-resistance-physical We have balls, so we sit legs apart #manspreading The nose on that ugly feminist ****, why are feminists always dog ugly... bitterness is why
Like you did with your climate change crap, until I pointed out that the article was literally paid for by Exxon and then you disappeared? What part is wrong? All of it. It's completely made up. Gender studies and social sciences are a ****ing plot to instill communist ideals in people? It's absolutely ****ing mental! It's utterly detached from reality and baseless. You know who agreed with you, though? This bloke: please log in to view this image
Channel 4’s ‘brownface’ documentary is no way to portray Muslims Radhika Sanghani https://www.theguardian.com/comment...-documentary-my-week-as-a-muslim-niqab-racism I can post so many of these culturally marxist oppressed and oppressors articles from the marxist Guardian.
I did neither of those things and claiming that you've won an internet argument is a sure sign that you haven't.
I knew a bird with violent tendencies...she threw a *** at me once..I cracked her one on the jaw...funnily enough she never did it again. Too many women know the man is in trouble if he fights back..**** mode at its best
Marxism = Economics Oppressed vs Oppressors. In this case the poor vs anything wealthier than them, the poorer you are the more of a victim you are, the richer you are the more of an oppressor you are. Effort made is irrelevant, ergo a junkie who never did **** is oppressed by the guy who went to school until they were 26 and studied like **** and worked his ass off We need the state to be marxist and force equality of outcome with wealth redistribution. **** effort and meritocracy Inequality is oppression by marxist definition, individual effort and choices is irrelevant We must pit group against group identity, the individual is irrelevant Cultural = Marxism Social sciences and gender studies If you are the minority you are the oppressed, if the majority you are the oppressor. If you are a woman, you are oppressed, if you are a man you are the oppressor If you are gay you are oppressed, if you are straight you are the oppressor If you are black you are oppressed, if you are white you are the oppressor We need the state to force equality of outcome, we need to make it easier for black gay trans and women than straight white men, **** effort and meritocracy Inequality is oppression by marxist definition, individual effort and choices are irrelevant We must pit group against group identity, the individual is irrelevant Do tell me what is not true here, and I can source the **** out of it with the typical **** media you read, maybe even with just Guardian articles... "If you are the minority you are the oppressed, if the majority you are the oppressor." << I don't see women in this line, how did you relate this to women?
The whole thing is just made up, you pathetic fantasist. Here's Breivik talking about applying for a firearms license: "In any case; I would rather have preferred a Ruger Mini 30, but I already own a 7.62 bolt rifle and it is likely that the police wouldn’t grant me a similar caliber. On the application form I stated: “hunting deer”. It would have been tempting to just write the truth; “executing category A and B cultural Marxists/multiculturalist traitors” just to see their reaction" You sound just like him. Totally detached from reality and with utter conviction that you're in some way superior.
Marxism = Economics Oppressed vs Oppressors. In this case the poor vs anything wealthier than them, the poorer you are the more of a victim you are, the richer you are the more of an oppressor you are. Effort made is irrelevant, ergo a junkie who never did **** is oppressed by the guy who went to school until they were 26 and studied like **** and worked his ass off We need the state to be marxist and force equality of outcome with wealth redistribution. **** effort and meritocracy Inequality is oppression by marxist definition, individual effort and choices is irrelevant We must pit group against group identity, the individual is irrelevant Cultural = Marxism Social sciences and gender studies If you are the minority you are the oppressed, if the majority you are the oppressor. If you are a woman, you are oppressed, if you are a man you are the oppressor If you are gay you are oppressed, if you are straight you are the oppressor If you are black you are oppressed, if you are white you are the oppressor We need the state to force equality of outcome, we need to make it easier for black gay trans and women than straight white men, **** effort and meritocracy Inequality is oppression by marxist definition, individual effort and choices are irrelevant We must pit group against group identity, the individual is irrelevant Where am I wrong?
The whole thing is wrong. It's nonsense. Endlessly reposting it doesn't change that. It's a fabrication.
Marxism = Economics Oppressed vs Oppressors. In this case the poor vs anything wealthier than them, the poorer you are the more of a victim you are, the richer you are the more of an oppressor you are. Effort made is irrelevant, ergo a junkie who never did **** is oppressed by the guy who went to school until they were 26 and studied like **** and worked his ass off We need the state to be marxist and force equality of outcome with wealth redistribution. **** effort and meritocracy Inequality is oppression by marxist definition, individual effort and choices is irrelevant We must pit group against group identity, the individual is irrelevant Cultural Marxism = Social sciences and gender studies If you are the minority you are the oppressed, if the majority you are the oppressor. If you are a woman, you are oppressed, if you are a man you are the oppressor If you are gay you are oppressed, if you are straight you are the oppressor If you are black you are oppressed, if you are white you are the oppressor We need the state to force equality of outcome, we need to make it easier for black gay trans and women than straight white men, **** effort and meritocracy Inequality is oppression by marxist definition, individual effort and choices are irrelevant We must pit group against group identity, the individual is irrelevant WHY IS IT WRONG?
That's not how arguments work. You're making massive, sweeping claims. Why are they right? You've made up this ****ing nonsense about a society wide conspiracy and it's utterly baseless. Reposting it doesn't change that.
You said "define cultural marxism" I posted Marxism vs Cultural Marxism You said "its all wrong" I asked "how?" You refused to say how ever since Marxism = Economics Oppressed vs Oppressors. In this case the poor vs anything wealthier than them, the poorer you are the more of a victim you are, the richer you are the more of an oppressor you are. Effort made is irrelevant, ergo a junkie who never did **** is oppressed by the guy who went to school until they were 26 and studied like **** and worked his ass off We need the state to be marxist and force equality of outcome with wealth redistribution. **** effort and meritocracy Inequality is oppression by marxist definition, individual effort and choices is irrelevant We must pit group against group identity, the individual is irrelevant Cultural Marxism = Social sciences and gender studies If you are the minority you are the oppressed, if the majority you are the oppressor. If you are a woman, you are oppressed, if you are a man you are the oppressor If you are gay you are oppressed, if you are straight you are the oppressor If you are black you are oppressed, if you are white you are the oppressor We need the state to force equality of outcome, we need to make it easier for black gay trans and women than straight white men, **** effort and meritocracy Inequality is oppression by marxist definition, individual effort and choices are irrelevant We must pit group against group identity, the individual is irrelevant What am I wrong about and why won't you pick one point and we can discuss?
Don't blame me, if the ****** acted not ******ed SJW moronic, we'd have been done ages ago Getting close to ignore levels so no worries
