Should Sock Accounts be Allowed?

You’d have to be a drooling simpleton to not understand what I’m aski...

Oh, wait... !

 

Humour us Quentin ... coz you seem a bit shy ... you aren't suggesting bans for other posters (yet again) are you Quents?

 

Surely not, as i hope the new regime stick to the words of the old regime about people asking for bans.

 

Surely only a drooling simpleton would be asking for bans for other posters?

 

Especially now we have an even more ban happy simpleton.

 

You do like to try and persist with your lies, despite not being able to back it up, and the evidence suggesting to the contrary.

Why not crack on and post like others seem to be doing, instead of whining like a spoiled kid that can't get his own way.

 

It's obvious that Hiag feels strongly about those that put up his FB info...he merely seeks justice and that is his perogative considering it was his FB info that was plastered onto here not anyone else's.

 

People will find out soon enough what you are like as mod, not just a poster i expect.

 

Yep, and you still haven't worked out that your bleating will just mean I stay as mod down here all the longer.

 

... so are you in favour of his banning requesting then? ...

 

I'm not that bothered, as i will never accep you, other than anything but an utter **** (as voted for by the people)

 

You're not bothered enough to mention it no end of times.

Just forget about it and post.

 

I'm saying I don't know how furious I would be if someone did that to me...ideally I might want to cave someones head in if he thought it was amusing to put pictures up of my family members...but in the context of this place, a ban might feel as though justice is done, for Hiag.

Would you be offended if someone had put pictures up of someone's child without their consent on here? If so, why so? Because it is the social norm to be outraged at such things? However the principal is the same...someone's family member(s) pics went up without consent and that person isn't happy about it.

You think Hiag gives a **** about the code of conduct on here over that? If it wasn't Hiag, I'm sure you would understand

 

I don't blame Bambi for his fear.

He needs to belong. I understand that.

 

If somebody put pictures of my family up on here, I would be demanding that posters IP address was banned forever.

 

I agree in principle but there us context too

So I think spurlock threatened with being exposed woukd be worse than say Pete getting pics posted of his family.

Pete saying he was being stalked because his kitchen cabinet colour was mentioned was his own fault because he has a link to a pic of his kitchen

Similarly posters post pics of themselves, cars and houses etc. I choose not to but don't give them abuse and say my car is better or gf prettier etc. Not that it justifies entirely it but I can see "how it got there"

That said consistency would be banning ALL posters who cross a line. You can't have one giving it large how he exposed a poster not being chastised and others banned for less

My tuppence

 

What about girlfiends?

 

Totally true.

Old tubby saxton has had his life exposed here and that is his own fault. Likewise HIAG has been doxxed but the info that doxxed him was given freely by him.

Now obviously it's not nice to be doxxed but if you're that unpleasant (saxton) or you've been goading people to find out about you (HIAG) then it's not at all surprising.

However, reality are both are ban-able offences.

Lastly, is there actually any evidence that the people who HIAG wants banned actually did the crime because as far as i can see, it's just HIAG pointing fingers at his arch nemeses.

 

If it wasn't HIAG, you wouldn't be taking the stance you are now taking ... he's the Spurs special needs case

I doubt it would have happened to you ... and that's the real point here ... as the late lamented, but possibly not banned Stan commented, HIAG's existence on here has been a catalogue of mocking, demeaning and belittling the comments, achievements and lifestyles of those that he has had issues with ... and has led to him getting banned from several club boards ... feelings towards him have been further exacerbated by his claims of superiority and preeminence ... which we now know have been hugely inflated ... because some people got fed up of his boasting and general attitude and decided to bring him down a peg or two ... posting his personal details was wrong ... but why did it happen to HIAG and not to someone else?

His big problem now is ego ... he is positively fuming that his self promoted myth of being some sort of cross between Jon Bon Jovi and a character from L.A. Law has been exposed as closer to Yvonne Ton Bovine and a jobbing conveyancer with Turnip & Co ... that has him rattled to **** and he is finding it hard to deal with ...

... but if the "New HIAG was genuinely interested in Board harmony, he'd just move on and let it go ... but he won't ... his ego won't allow it ... he was out manoeuvred by some of his prime adversaries ... and it galls him ...

... he needs to just accept that ... it's like footie ... we can't all be winners ... be the bigger man and move on