He's including the keeper own goal. Which isn't an assist as if we're being pedantic the assist was the shot from Hernandez.
We aren’t being pedantic. You are. I’m not sure why you’re so determined to downplay his contribution. Is it because he didn’t start well and you made your mind up about him then but now that he has shown to be better than you thought you don’t want to go back on it?
I said of late he has played well. He still has too many errors to his all round game - passing being one. The other being for chunks of a game he goes missing. His work rate has improved, but for periods yesterday you could be forgiven for thinking he wasn't even on the pitch. One assist for me doesn't gloss over the basic errors he made yesterday. We'd have comfortably won regardless of his assist. One of his miss hit passes was straight to a QPR player on the attack, with our defence out of position- a better team than QPR would have punished that mistake.
Silly **** - you're so obsessed with Meyler playing you lose sight of anything rational Adkins was delighted with the performance of returning David Meyler. No **** Sherlock. He should have been in our midfield every game he was available for. #503 GLP, Wednesday at 1:10 PM the only poster who agrees with you is Chazz, ( aka of Meylers great, Huddlestones **** fame) who is also obsessed with him Henriksen started poorly yesterday but only for about the first 15 minutes but soon got back to the level hes capable of - Wilson started poorly yesterday as well - why didn't you call him a useless **** as well - Henriksen's a good player and is a far better option than Meyler - at Bolton, Meylers first 9 passes were to a Bolton player - I've looked but I cant find you calling Meyler ****ing useless, perhaps you could point me to it you really are ****ing clueless, you were the same with Junior spouting about him being the best centre back outside of the top six in the Prem - its a ****ing mystery really why hes warming the bench at Wigan and only Bury would give him a game seeing as how he's so good
I have been Henriksen’s biggest critic, I thought he was terrible, but since the Millwall game he’s been very good. He’s added a bit of bite to his game. He has fairly decent ball retention as well and provides an attacking threat. It’s weird really as he’s been horrendous albeit a few weeks under Silva before he got injured.
hey silly **** stop putting this same ****ing lie over and over and over again. Did you say henriksen was ****ing **** against brum when we got ****ed over? No did you ****. As it happens I've stuck up for henriksen more than most on here but you don't want to ****ing see that you ****. You're a ****ing tool who wants to have a scapegoat allthe time to make up for your own inadequate ****ing life.
Says Mr Clueless McFucking Clueless from Cluelessville. You're a ****ing dim idiot. I'm surprised Hendriksen has escaped your criticism. You criticise every other ****ing player whilst 'claiming' to be a supporter that goes home and away. Just goes to show how selective your misplaced judgement is. You thick dopey ****.
Whilst you lot were watching what sounds a good game spare a thought for me.As part of a stag weekend I had to endure Latics v MKD My selection is Powell Grigg Massey
Other than McGregor and Bowen, everyone was ****ing **** against Brum, many far ****ter than Henriksen. In fact, it was an absolute ****fest.
