Wrong! The Anunnki were a group of deities that appeared in the mythological traditions of the ancient Sumerians. Totally and utterly implausible that's why Icke Plageriased Zechariah Sitchin's work because it suited his agenda.
of course anything in life thats abused can cause issues....ask the diabetic society>>>>>>>>that's why I respect thy choice of high...I also enjoy hallucinogenic and treat them as mind cleansing exercise.........or in other words having a laugh with friends. I enjoy lifes simpler things>>>most are free(at present).........but I do take issue with those that oppress my choices through acts of government driven by a family hell bent on total control. that's not asking a lot surely
Which bit are you saying is wrong? Many of the Abrahimic stories are based on the myths, and were used to control the masses. They are corruptions of myths, yet some still believe them. Don't you consider them bonkers too?
in my mates house with a few other friends dude>>>>with plenty of smoking, coffee and coconut rings going around ....its what every lunatic does I quess
People from day one have attempted to control the masses, it's not an entirely new concept you know. Myths are just that MYTHs and have no truth behind them.
Which is pretty much what I'm saying, but you're avoiding answering the question. Do you believe the people believing corruptions of myths created by man to control the masses, to be bonkers too?
Not at all and for what it's worth I personally believe a lot of drugs should be legalised. There's also an argument in favour of drug use and how our brains naturally react to substances, Psilocybes for example.
No, Dave because Icke told the world he was the son of God and Purple was the holy colour yet he doesn't wear purple any more...Hmm cast out of heaven perhaps?
I am ok with this clip, providing you understand the essence of the scientific method as it applied to Einstein. The first two major tests of Relativity were the : 1. orbit of the planet Mercury 2. light "shift" caused by the gravity of large objects #1 was ok to attempt, because there were years of astronomical measurements for the orbit of Mercury. #2 was a prediction (AFAIK until the Eddington expedition no such measurement data was available) . The Relativity model computed #1, and came up with the same results as the measurements when the Newton model did not. The data from the Eddington expedition matched what Einstein had predicted. So in a similar vein, what is #1 / #2 for the Icke theory ?? What experiments/tests can we do right now to confirm/ refute the theory ??
You’re brilliant at incorrect assumptions and pigeon holing given you supposedly pride yourself at being a free thinker fella. I smoked green for years and know exactly what effect it has thanks, I also saw a mate sectioned as a result of acute psychosis caused by his love of the green and shrooms.
The 'moon is a spaceship' one is currently not falsifiable, because we cannot get to the surface of the moon with the type and number of instruments we use worldwide to currently map the innards of this planet.
I like your style>>>its pretty clear why cbd would work on sufferers of Epilepsy and Alzheimer’s there is light at the end of the tunnel for some thanks 2 the power of the internet and world wide sharing of information>>>>>>but it hasn't been fast enough for others who suffered for an ignorant lying world wide health organisation and its agenda........ie big pharma contracts
Mr @aberdude how accurately would you say the wiki page portrays Ickes ideas? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Icke#Conspiracy_Theories Just interested to know how representative it is
......you English are weak when it comes 2 shrooms I tell thee..........but in all seriousness maybe if you cared you could have lessoned his usage into the same amounts you smoked......example if my mate drank/alcohol more than he should be and it was having a detrimental effect on his life I think I may have nipped it in the bud(excuse the pun) sooner rather than later..............but that's not 2 say ive not lost many a friend 2 the bottom of a bottle>>
