That's quite literally true According to google they're still legal but I have to agree I haven't seen one for ages. They're probably a bit like that scorpion kick thingy the Columbia keeper did. Brilliant if they come off but you look a bit of a nob if they don't.
Another thing is the recent American habit of regarding convince and persuade as interchangeable. You don't convince someone to, you convince them that or of something, you persuade people to.
It's official... Are YOU a 'grammar Nazi'? You're probably a jerk: Language pedants are more likely to be introverted and disagreeable. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...y-introverted-disagreeable.html#ixzz5AwYKM2AZ
Are you an ill-educated oaf incapable of using your own language correctly? You are probably, quite literally, a Lambrettaman.
That's not quite accurate. A campaign by the American Society for the use of more better Grammar was ran to convince people to adopt the correct usage. 99.9% of Americans are now persuade to do so. Quite literally.
I believe you are inferring that I made the statistic up. However, irregardless in a quite infamous report entitled ironically "Things Stockholm Literally Didn't Make Up" you will find I'm telling a truth. https://www.completelymadeuplinkthatprobbalygoesnowhere.com
Hardly my fault that you and Castro don't read the posts in the manner they were intended. And if either of you ****ers want to continue this nonsense, do it by PM, it's really boring for everyone else.
No, I am not saying you made it up. I was saying if it was 99.9 then it quite literally couldn't be 99.8 or 100.
You butted in on the thread trying to be clever. Just because you quite literally can't express yourself clearly don't get abusive to others. Still haven't got over your **** up claiming it was a trained sniper and not a routinely armed police officer whilst we are on tbe subject on not reading posts properly, have you?
I did ask for this nonsense to end, as my request was ignored and the thread was being ruined, I've ended it.
