He might put some daft commentary on it. I'm not sure why it matters though. It won't affect what the Trust do next either way, we'll be pushing for a proper ticketing model either way, and he'll probably resist. I don't really understand all this talk of him claiming a victory or what people even mean by it. He authorised the ballot. He doesn't really win or lose whatever happens.
I don't believe a thing Ehab says. I don't believe he'll offer further concessions any time soon, but then I didn't believe we'd get to this stage either. We'll just carry on doing everything in our power to make it a reality. It's worked so far. If there's no progress then there'll be further protests, and that's where Ehab loses because he obviously hates and fears protest.
I never got a confirmation at the time ... perhaps I voted for the wrong 'option' for the Pallamster ...
Thanks for that, PLT. I could easily believe he would favour a no vote, I think most of us thought that the obvious option for him. The sad thing is he can just a easily spin the yes vote. TWT. I do think it is sometimes underestimated who might read these hallowed threads; a bit if discretion can go a long way at critical times, and I'm led to believe these are critical times.
Believe it or not, I totally agree with you; but it does leave me with a couple of questions, if I'm allowed to pose them: You seem to be saying that the ballot and it's result is irrelevant to the next actions of the Trust (something I've said should be the case), so why have you endorsed it? Because the Trust have endorsed the ballot, he can spin either result - this has been voiced on here by some prominent and connected posters - you seem to disagree, but I'm curious to know what the Trust have done to prevent this?
What? By your own ‘advice’ you should have quoted each and every relevant post in the conversation so I know what you’re talking about...
Rubbish; just the one you thought requiring an explanation. Why not try understanding the simplicity of TOM's point, rather than getting angry at me for reflecting your thoughts?:
I wonder if there'll be some sort of joint announcement, as the return to the use of Hull City on everything is also supposed to be sorted this week?
