When’s the last time anybody robbed a bank anywhere? Most of those old lags gave it up 30yrs ago. And thanks for highlighting that US has been prioritising the protection of money rather than its future - it’s kids! Only in America!
So you won't answer the question but admit that having trained armed staff acts as a deterrent and will minimise casualties but you are against this ?
It’s absolute ****ing nonsense! If the damn guns weren’t so freely available to every disaffected headcase of 18 or more then there would be no need for armed guards, Armed guards in a school!!...ffs!...
Most thieves rob banks on line these days. Why risk death by wannabe policemen when you can click your way to a million dollars
You can't answer simple questions so there is little point replying to me. Would well trained armed school staff prevent mass casualties in schools ? The answer is Yes .
Why the **** should I waste my time answering ridiculous, irrelevant questions? It’s really quite simple. Stop making access to deadly and military assault weapons available to headcases with either an overdose of teenage testosterone or more than one or two ****ing screws loose. It ain’t rocket science - unless you’re Trump and/or the NRA and don’t give a flying **** about kids being mown down in their own schools.
too many gun nuts with large arsenals and fortified strongholds to rip up the second amendment, that really would trigger a spate of shoot-outs and armed sieges. Guns will always be around, sadly, and this will always happen, it's the 17th school shooting this year, more than 1 a week.
The Maryland shooter had a shot gun and shot at 2 people . How would banning assault rifles have prevented this ? You just stick to your spoon fed narrative even when it wasn't relevant. The idea to arm people working at schools worked on this occasion but you ignore this. The bank example works . Can you please try not to use swear words in that aggressive manner it's unnecessary .
Going around in circles!!.. The vast majority of these nutters have legally bought a military assault weapon and then used it to commit mass murder. Only a ultra right wing lunatic would leap on the rare case where one wasn’t used and try and justify both the continued free sale of these weapons that have no other purpose than to kill human beings and the almost surreal idea of placing armed guards in kids schools. With the possibility of arming teachers too.
Ultra right wing = Praises the swift and brave response of the armed staff member. Under 1 minute response since the first shot.
That was the feeling I had when I read this . Bad guy got shot by good guy and saved a bloodbath hunt against 100s of sitting ducks . All of the other straw person arguments about assault rifles are yours. It's unnecessary for anyone to own one but that's not the case in this shooting.
Do you think there would be less chance of banks being robbed by gunmen if there were fewer guns freely available? A Yes B No C I'm not sure because I fail to see the correlation between less guns and less gun crime because I'm a tad stupid
Let's try a simple equation .. fewer guns ... fewer bullets fired ... fewer deaths ... are you still with me?
I give up trying to get through to you. Your thought process is as warped and twisted as the one that allows this senseless slaughter to continue, when something could very easily be done by merely restricting, or preferably banning altogether weapons that serve no other purpose than to kill human beings.
If you have 0 guns then nobody gets killed by guns. If you stop people buying guns legally then there will still be millions of guns in America and for most gun crimes for obvious reasons they are readily available illegal guns.
Change has to start somewhere ... an amnesty for automatic and semi-automatic weapons should be the first step - most of these should be licenced and so should be easy to police - after that very hefty jail sentences to anybody found in possession of one
