Really though? To who? I'm guessing not publicly. Why not state in the ballot that the suggested prices are only indicative if they are that open to amendments? Remember they also indicated they would sell the club in 24 hours and that football should be free like the £36 a month air we breathe. I just can't vote based on a hope of what these two might do afterwards.
Boycotting is not really protesting as most will assume crowds are falling with the quality of football. I hope your making your voices heard at away matches cos there is no protesting at the KC at present. I'd love to make a stance but as a united group but this will not happen because we can't agree on which way the wind is going.
There is a world of difference to the owner saying something and supporters getting a vote. Its been posted on here, so why not accept it. It sup to you, but when we lose the chance of ever getting concessions back, how will you feel then. Actually, bollocks to this, you ****ing posted on here saying that you could not make your mind up and then all you have done is post reasons for not voting, your ****ing mind was made up before you asked the question and nothing posted by anyone else will make a blind bit of difference, but you will still do business with the owners, to make a shilling or two, whilst moaning that they will not budge on price. ****, **** off.
Ha. Nice. Unwarranted personal insults because I gave a differing viewpoint. I still haven’t made up my mind. I’m discussing merits either way. The replies I get back are pro concessions so I am balancing that out to help make my own mind up and put the merits of both votes out there for everyone. In fact the only time I’ve suggested which way I'd vote was when I said that the removal of zone 3 made me sway slightly towards voting that way. You ok hun? *edit Also, in my personal situation the group of 3 of us would actually pay slightly less overall. I'd pay a bit more (which I have repeated more than once is fine as the price is very reasonable), but it would be more affordable for my sisters to pay for my nephews which is another reason I may selfishly vote for concessions.
You shouldn't be so angry, TOM You've won. It's a foregone conclusion. The members will vote for Allams 'concessions'. Well done you
I'm not angry nor am I trying to win, it just pisses me off when posters ask for help deciding and then argue the point.
Maybe they just don't think they should take your word as Gospel? They just want to hear opinions from both sides? Not just go with what anyone on here tells them? Do you take the advice of everyone that offers it?
Dude, calm down. Why would it piss you off? Isn't that how decisions should be made? Weighing everything up, not just asking for somebody else's opinion and saying "ok that'll do". Surely it's better to look at both sides and come to a reasoned decision, not just go with what you are told?
Were you saying “there’s no way they’ll consider introducing concessions” before the club starting considering them? This notion that this vote is a one off and no further changes will ever be considered is simply not supported by the clear evidence of the last few months.
huh? None of those posts say which way I would vote?? In fact every one of them (bar the last saying I may vote for concessions) shows how I am undecided either way! These trawling posts for quotes to prove somebody is wrong/lying/changing their mind are cool when they work. This one failed. Sorry.
Indeed, the notion that this vote isn't the end of it works both ways though. It shouldn’t be a factor in decision making. I don’t think.
There's nothing reasoned about most of your posts on this thread, much of it has been lopsided and wholly inaccurate. We all agree that the concessions don't go far enough and that to be made acceptable to most people, they'll have to go further. But unless the vote goes in favour of reintroducing concessions, they're going nowhere.
