Match Day Thread Manchester United V Liverpool

Keys and Gray sacked - January 2011

Gary Neville appointed - August 2011

 

Can't agree with that at all. He deserves to be hung out to dry and then some the scummy cretin. He's a disgrace and vulgar

 

Bit worse than a mistake because he's famous? Spitting takes a split second, easy to make a split second mistake, only takes a rush of blood.

I'm not defending him, I just don't see him being sacked.

 

Carraghwr stopped playing football way before then.

 

gray binned when?

neville.hired when?

answers

jan 2011

may 2011

so.... no not a good few years at all.

 

Look.... as far as our club goes... he's an ex player so as long as he's not an ambassador it means little to the club.

He can live or die on Sky's morals.

 

never hear of negotiations

neville saw out his contract with utd.

 

Find it amusing that so many Liverpool fans are saying he should be made an example of yet hardly anyone thought the same when Suarez bit players #notaliverpoolassetanymore

 

if he walks into kirkby as a coach after this it will be ridiculous

 

You suggested get set Keys & Gray up because they had Neville lined up. If that was the case, it wouldn't have taken 6mths to appoint Gary would it?

No doubt you'll claim to have been wumming soon though...

 

You suggesting Liverpool have morals?

 

Make good t shirts.

Also carra stopped playing football before nev did.

 

Did we not? I'm sure you mods could dig the threads out.

I know plenty thought he was targeted....and railroaded at times but I'm almost sure plenty saw the biting as a "please clear off" moment ....

I did anyway.

 

Two attempts at the same joke...

 

To the point that he should be sacked? #moneytalks #****morals

 

as i said neville had a utd contract to see out sat on the bench...

not bloody hard mate

keep trying though.

as i said my opinion is sky wanted gray go e so he was gone.

it will be interesting to see if sky want carragher gone now.

frankly the state of bt sports punditry means they can afford to dump him and just get someoe else in

 

I'm suggesting nothing other than he s not an employee at the club so as far as we are concerned this doesn't reflect on us.

Since.... we've had thousands of players in our history and aren't beholden to their actions after they stop playing for us unless we employ them in another role?

 

Not sacked but sold .... as I say I'm fairly sure that opinion was stated on here by a few .

Your example we are discussing here.

 

Contracts don't prevent you from retiring