Off Topic Skylarker

Yeah nice try avoiding my question.

Who are the sock 6?
It was one of them who gave me the vb account right?

So name them

 

Of course you haven't, you're only interested in making it just another Les, Les,Les thread.

 

I'm calling for all of the sock 6 to be banned for having a sock account @brb

If I can get a ban for an accusation and no evidence I expect the same for them who have broken site rules.

Fair enough I think?

 

Sucky got undone for reasons that have not been made public (so I presume).

I don't know why brb banned Sucky, and I don't know whether or not Sucky was the person ultimately responsible for using the VB as the vehicle to post my personal data.

With respect, however, that isn't what I am interested in.

What I want is to verify the name of the person who made a PM to the VB conspirators informing them that he had given Sucky the VB password in order to post the photos. I have been given the name of that person, but it is for the very reason that I don't have the evidence to back it up that I am not revealing that person's name. I want to post the screenshot of the PM conversation that proves it.

Let us all be clear on this.

That is all I am interested in.

The person who has the screenshot can get it to me, and I promise that his name will never be revealed by me, and I will ensure that any reference to him on that screenshot is removed before I post it.

 

It won't happen Les, youre being taken (again).

 

Cos he's a snivelling tedious prick.

 

Is this just your way of getting revenge on Libby for getting you banned?

 

Thank you!

This is exactly what I have been asking brb to do.

They all need time in the Cooler.

But a certain two of those posters need far longer in the Cooler than the rest. And one of that two is very clearly identified in the screenshot (so I am told).

I would suggest two weeks for the peripheral members of the VB gang and 6 months each for the two main culprits.

That would be fair, in my view.

 

Everybody has already stated that the forum was better when he got ****ed off (again) but he doesn't appear to agree with everybody else. Talk about a smug fat little runt.

 

You want people banned for using a sock account?

 

You don't seem to realise that your views count for jack ****.

 

It was, it was much better. Everyone got along much better, the threads were a damn sight better.

 

You’re ****ing tragic.

 

Me and Libby are cool.

This is about me getting a ban on the back of an accusation and no evidence provided. "evidence" being a screenshot of me beating accused.

Wouldn't fly in court.

Now I don't know who the sock 6 are, but @brb does I think.

So why have they not had time in the cooler. They're bang to rights.

That's my point here, one of them named me in this shot and I'll have em all banned if I can for that alone

 

Would that include Saintsfan 08, 667, Cornish Clive et al?

 

No, Stan.

I expect the rules of this site to be upheld by those who conspire to cravenly hide behind a sock account in order to make cyber attacks on others.

 

He's like a 12 year old

 

Haven't most of them named themselves already?