Why would it hurt me, its an internet forum. Try putting your professional head on, imagine what a dick you would look in court. Well how did they find his details, band, solicitor, south coast, a professional person goading people with that detail on a tinpot forum. A professional person that would have to be publically registered. A professional person who displays himself on public domains ie youtube (although i i never watched your vids). You do know the law i assume if you put stuff in the public domain?...firstly the police will do nothing, the best you could do would be to sue the offender through the small claims court...or you could try the copyright route.. good luck with that one You could of course go the stalker route, police might be interested in that...but when they see the words wum master, you will be a laughing stock. You was lucky not to get the daily pizza deliveries, ive seen far worse than what has happened to you. Not forgetting you was lucky i was on the forum at the time, if hadn't of been around, only knows what would have been posted - but looking at your continued stance you learned nothing.
Much of your post may well have had some credence, posting personal stuff, pics, etc, was all bang out of order, no argument there, but almost every post I've seen you make since I started looking on this forum has always been all about you. You blagged and blagged, lied and lied, wummed and wummed. And you were pretty good at it. But it all came to a head and I fear that it'll take a while for this forum to recover. You sow what you reap. And you reaped pretty well but it was only a matter of time.
As lawyers go Les you’re as dense as silicon. I guess we were all initially intrigued that you might have been the forums Perry Mason but saddened to have only got a house basher. So with your limited knowledge of general law one would imagine you might have to substantiate your claims that I was involved in the hilarious episode. As you cannot perhaps you would be better served in getting all your facts right. I’m probably only one in a long list of people you have threatened with legal action with those scurrilous claims. But you’re right in that you were embarrassed and personally I thought it was well deserved and hilariously funny. On the note of mates I very much doubt brb even knows who I am let alone be mates. But do you not see the irony of the ‘Wum Master’ being out wummed.
What i find amazing is that we have a solicitor and an accountant on this forum, both being professional jobs who discuss details of their life on an internet forum. I could think of a number of jobs where you would contractually be advised not do so. I'm surprised those jobs don't fall under that guidance. Even more amazing they are both the biggest wums on here Personally i prefer to stick to opinions rather than discussing my life as a course of response. Whereas HiaG could just not help himself in desperation to get one over on another. I think that is where the wum master crosses boundaries himself. For example if someone never discussed their private life on here then i would say 100% protect them. But HiaG continually loaded his own gun...not by wumming people we all do that but by constant disclosure and then expecting the voluntary admin team to protect him ! As i said earlier, what was done was wrong, but he should think himself lucky i was online at the time, because playing russian roulette the bullet will eventually align.
Surely all that can be proved is that Sucky posted some of HIAGs personal ****. How did HIAG come to the conclusion that Piskie and Ginge were involved? Or is that just conjecture?
I struggled with that one initially. I knew of the Village bike but i couldn't remember those behind it, simply because i periodically clear out my PM's. It appears Sky, Libby and HiaG (not so sure about the latter) knew who the key holders were ie being them very first two in that list. Bearing in mind these discussions are happening in private. I struggled with the detail first, as they claimed there was only six holders, i knew that to be factual incorrect. It appears that was based on that you can only have six people in a PM...again factually untrue if i get copied in. What the trio did not think about is that i have a greater knowledge of the site workings than they do, so while they were wanting me to fire off bullets, i was hesitant to do so because i saw gaps in what they said. For example Ginge, a completely innocent party in all this, quite easily could have been shot in the crossfire if i had not held back. My waiting game and a few PMs by me outside of their little clicky group, eventually revealed the truth. So as you say....conjecture and part why i turned on Skygrasser.
