He's back...

Rattled.

 

I didn't miss the point though Dibs as I posted prior to you jumping the gun but talking about the abuse he has used twice against Fosse but cried when I called SD a Cock Chewer yesterday. #twofaced

 

Genuinely, yes, I was, on that occasion, Tel.

Poor Matth walked in at the wrong moment. PNP has explained very neatly what went down, and I apologised for my outburst. Matth understands, and everything has been sorted.

Just like how it should be on this forum.

 

Prosecution?

 

Yes, that would be one way.

However, I was talking about something more direct. Fighting fire with fire, so to speak.

 

Libby, Libby, Libby ... read what I actually write ... I have consistently (on several occasions) condemned the posting of his personal details .. I have also informed him that he has been barking up the wrong tree with who he thinks it is ... what I have taken issue with is his erroneous protestations that he wouldn't usually demand bans ... he's demanded more than anyone else .... ever

 

And how exactly would you know who it is?

 

Whoever it was that posted Hiag’s personal photos is a massive prick! There’s no nicer way of putting it.

It’s bang out of order. And an extremely ****ish thing to do.

 

Double bluff?

 

Fossy thinks he knows everything

The truth would destroy him

 

I'm up for that mate but I know you're a technophobe and rely on others to sort your internet **** out for you so I'm not entirely convinced you or your people are up to it given our previous conversations via pm.

 

Oh yeah Fosse knew exactly who the bike was but would never say it

 

I'm going for a cup of tea.

 

Get the popcorn in, looks like you'll need it

 

ffs Bambi!

Are you being obtuse on purpose to wind me up?

I have only now asked for anyone to be banned - the coward being The Village Bike, and who posted my personal details. I do that because I (and others) believe that it is in the best interests of the longevity of this site, and to send a harsh message that this kind of **** is not to be repeated - either to attack me, or anyone else, including you.

If there is no ban, then it is sending the clear message that we can use socks to post the personal details of fellow posters, and only the sock will be deleted.

I have never, before now, asked for anyone to be banned (outside of an obvious wum).

The alleged "asking Pixie to be banned" incident was, in fact, nothing of the sort. Pixie posted my personal details on this forum, and I simply reminded brb of his earlier statement, that anyone doing that would face a 6 months' ban.

 

... because I actually read posts ...

 

Two sugars please

 

My name is Legion for we are many.
Mark 5:9

 

I went out for an hour to look at a house and I don't understand what the **** they're talking about now.

 

I am pretty good at that Quentin ... but no ... so you didn't demand to go above brb's head when he wouldn't ban anyone during "Vegasgate" ? ... must be my memory