He's back...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Revealing someone's details on the open forum is out of order - complete agreement ... but Quents is off on another of his rants and is targeting the wrong poster on this occasion... ribbing him about his double standards is fair game ... if this was the only time he had called for bans I'd have far more sympathy ... but it isn't <ok>

Please, for the love of God, stop with this ****, Fosse!

Stop being a dickhead and lumping in what these cowards have done with something completely unrelated.

The two things are not the same. Let us stay on point, with this. It is too important an issue to continue to play your partisan games.

What we are all talking about is the activity of one user to post the personal details of another poster without that poster's consent.

Do you understand that basic premise? Yes or no?
 
So you don't want a ban for contravening the rules per se? .. just for instances where contravening the rules might be to your personal discomfort or detriment?

Wouldn't just banning everyone that has had a sock account cure the problem you are so passionate about, Quents?

**** off Fosse, do you genuinely think it was acceptable to do that?

I'm not one for calling for bans and I don't like to see them happen but if anything is worth one it's that.
 
Please, for the love of God, stop with this ****, Fosse!

Stop being a dickhead and lumping in what these cowards have done with something completely unrelated.

The two things are not the same. Let us stay on point, with this. It is too important an issue to continue to play your partisan games.

What we are all talking about is the activity of one user to post the personal details of another poster without that poster's consent.

Do you understand that basic premise? Yes or no?
More insults! your doing reet well today Hils. <ok>
 
Please feel free to quote my "offensive" comments ... I'm intrigued <laugh>

You are being offensive in that you continue to hurl insults and blame at me when I have been the victim of a cyber attack on this forum.

Do you understand that?

I'm asking you to stop with your dickish comments.
 
Fosse Skiddy and Piskie missing the point here hugely.

I suspect the reason for that is because, deep down, they don't believe there is anything wrong with what has happened to me.

God forbid someone employs someone to go and find personal information on these bastards, and then arranges for a sock to plaster it all over this forum!

Perhaps, then, they'd get the point?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock and Libby
My phone often does that...

This isn't about poster's mate it's about principle. I'd be exactly the same if it was Skiddy ffs. That's a promise.

My point is that you rarely seem to get when I'm being a complete tit purposely ... but you 'get' Quents ... the proof? ... you took my post about 'like fraud' seriously <laugh>

Similarly then, you have to accept that not everyone appreciates Quentin's sense of humour like you do and, ultimately, his past antics are the real cause of what has occurred on here recently ...

... but I completely agree that no poster should have his personal details shared on the public forum without his (or her) prior consent <ok>
 
I suspect the reason for that is because, deep down, they don't believe there is anything wrong with what has happened to me.

God forbid someone employs someone to go and find personal information on these bastards, and then arranges for a sock to plaster it all over this forum!

Perhaps, then, they'd get the point?
Some people don't need to employ people to do that as thats what they do for a living.
 
... but I completely agree that no poster should have his personal details shared on the public forum without his (or her) prior consent <ok>

That is all you need to say.

Add anything on the end of that, and it reads like "...but..." and completely undermines what you otherwise claim to believe in.
 
My point is that you rarely seem to get when I'm being a complete tit purposely ... but you 'get' Quents ... the proof? ... you took my post about 'like fraud' seriously <laugh>

Similarly then, you have to accept that not everyone appreciates Quentin's sense of humour like you do and, ultimately, his past antics are the real cause of what has occurred on here recently ...

... but I completely agree that no poster should have his personal details shared on the public forum without his (or her) prior consent <ok>

Im not interested in the past or who the poster is Fossy.

I wum you, you wum me. We get on fine..No issues.

I'm trying to rescue the board from going down the ****ter.
 
Some people don't need to employ people to do that as thats what they do for a living.

Yeah, well God forbid someone who doesn't do that for a living uses people that he knows very well and who do this for a living to go and dig out your personal information and plaster it all over this forum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock